Probability of finding a particle

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous1212144
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of finding a free particle at a different location after it has been observed at a certain position. Participants explore the implications of the particle's velocity and the vagueness of the initial question, as well as the mathematical framework involved in quantum mechanics, particularly the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the ability to calculate the probability depends significantly on the knowledge of the particle's velocity vector.
  • There is a proposal that the question is too vague to derive a specific formula without additional information about the particle.
  • Participants inquire about the type of particle and its velocity as necessary variables for any calculations.
  • One participant explains that the probability of finding a particle at an exact point is zero, and instead, one can calculate the probability within a small distance from that point.
  • A step-by-step approach is provided, involving solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation and using the time-dependent Schrödinger equation to determine how the wave function evolves over time.
  • There is a question about the differences between the free particle scenario and the "particle in a box," with an explanation that the wave functions differ due to the different Hamiltonians involved.
  • Another participant requests a general walkthrough of the processes or equations for graphing, indicating a desire for more detailed guidance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of agreement on the need for additional information to formulate a probability calculation. There is no consensus on a specific formula or method due to the complexity and vagueness of the initial question.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the vagueness of the initial question, the need for specific details about the particle's properties, and the mathematical complexities involved in quantum mechanics.

Anonymous1212144
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Let's say that I observed a free particle at a certain location. Is there any way I can calculate the probability of finding that same particle at another location when I look for it again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anonymous1212144 said:
Let's say that I observed a free particle at a certain location. Is there any way I can calculate the probability of finding that same particle at another location when I look for it again?
That's going to depend a great deal on how much you know about the particle's velocity vector. If you KNOW that it headed straight North, you're not likely to find it if you look farther South.
 
phinds said:
That's going to depend a great deal on how much you know about the particle's velocity vector. If you KNOW that it headed straight North, you're not likely to find it if you look farther South.
But is there a formula for it?
 
Anonymous1212144 said:
But is there a formula for it?
I think the question as posted is too vague for there to be a formula.
 
phinds said:
I think the question as posted is too vague for there to be a formula.
What other information do you need?
 
Anonymous1212144 said:
What other information do you need?
What kind of particle are you talking about? What is it's velocity vector? I'm not sure that's enough but you definitely need at least that much. I won't be any further help on this since the details are beyond my knowledge but perhaps someone else will chime in, assuming you do provide at least that information.
 
phinds said:
What kind of particle are you talking about? What is it's velocity vector? I'm not sure that's enough but you definitely need at least that much. I won't be any further help on this since the details are beyond my knowledge but perhaps someone else will chime in, assuming you do provide at least that information.
Couldn't the velocity and the kind of particle be two of the variables in the equation?
 
Anonymous1212144 said:
Let's say that I observed a free particle at a certain location. Is there any way I can calculate the probability of finding that same particle at another location when I look for it again?
Yes, although there are some caveats. One is that the probability of finding a particle at any particular point is always exactly zero; the best that we can do is say that the probability of finding the particle within a distance ##\epsilon## of that point is ##P##. When ##\epsilon## is very small and ##P## is close to unity, we say that the particle is found at that point (that is, ##P=1## and ##\epsilon=0##) but that's a simplification, and when we do the math to calculate the future behavior of the particle we'll need the real values. The second problem is that we also need to know the velocity of the particle, and that is subject to the same sort of uncertainty.

But with that said, the basic idea is:
1) Solve the time-independent Schrödinger's equation for a free particle. This will tell you what the possible wave functions are.
2) Select the wave function from #1 that is consistent with your initial observation.
3) Use the time-dependent Schrödinger equation to calculate how that wave function changes over time.
4) Use the solution to #3 above to calculate the probability of finding the particle at a distance ##\epsilon## from the point you're interested in at whatever later time ##t## you're interested in.

A college-level intro QM class will work through this, but it requires a fair amount of calculus and differential equations, not stuff that belongs in a B-level thread. However, if you want to dig further, you can try googling for "free particle gaussian".
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Anonymous1212144
Nugatory said:
snip
What's the difference between this and the "particle in a box"?
 
  • #10
Anonymous1212144 said:
What's the difference between this and the "particle in a box"?
When you go to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the particle in a box you'll find a different set of possible wave functions. This is because the TISE is ##H\psi=E\psi## and ##H## is different in the two cases. So answers we get will start to diverge after step #1 above.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Nugatory said:
But with that said, the basic idea is:
1) Solve the time-independent Schrödinger's equation for a free particle. This will tell you what the possible wave functions are.
2) Select the wave function from #1 that is consistent with your initial observation.
3) Use the time-dependent Schrödinger equation to calculate how that wave function changes over time.
4) Use the solution to #3 above to calculate the probability of finding the particle at a distance ##\epsilon## from the point you're interested in at whatever later time ##t## you're interested in.
I don't know if this is asking too much, but can you give me a general walkthrough of the processes? Or at least give me equations that I can graph?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K