MHB Probability of second heads on fifth flip

  • Thread starter Thread starter schinb65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
schinb65
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am wondering how to do this problem. I have a way that gave me the correct answer but I would not want to do this every time or for large numbers.

What I did:
So 2^5 equals 32 since the probability is 1/2 and I want 5 flips. Then I have 4 ways that the 2nd head will land on the 5th flip. So I have 4/32. which is 12.5%

I also tried Binomial distribution but did not get the correct answer.
5C2(.5)^2(.5)^3. I know that this will not work since the second head can be in any location but do not remember how I can make it work for this problem or if it would even work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: second head on fifth flip

Hi schinb65,

The problem is really important for this question because it gives us the situation from which we choose how to answer it. Flipping coins is usually binomial related but it's better to be too clear than not clear enough. I believe the question is something like "if you flip a coin until you reach a total of 2 heads what is the probability that the 2nd heads occurs on flip number 5?"

This appears to use the negative binomial distribution. I won't define everything here but there are two ways of thinking of this distribution: 1) counting the number of failures before the last success 2) counting the number of trials to achieve k successes

You have three variables to use in the probability function: k, r and p. k is the number of successes, r is the number of failures and p is the probability of a success.

If [math]P(X=k)=\binom{k+r-1}{k}(1-p)^r p^k[/math] can you use the above information to solve this? I think the first try you made is very close the to answer. The binomial coefficient should be different though. It can't be [math]\binom{5}{2}[/math] because that would allow the 5th flip to be tails some of the time, which isn't allowed.

Jameson
 
Re: second head on fifth flip

Hello, schinb65!

A coin is tossed 5 times.
Find the probability that the second Head occurs on the fifth toss.
In the first 4 tosses, we want 3 Tails and 1 Head in some order.
. . This probability is: .(_4C_3)\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^3\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) \:=\:\tfrac{1}{4}

Then we want a Head on the fifth toss: \tfrac{1}{2}

Therefore, the probability is: .\tfrac{1}{4}\cdot\tfrac{1}{2} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{8}
 
Re: second head on fifth flip

soroban just owned me, haha. (Punch)

This particular question can be answered like soroban showed, and the method is pretty intuitive. Like I mentioned, the problem the OP had was with understanding which terms are being arranged and which are not.

If these questions stay simple enough that you can imagine the experiment in your head, then that way is fine. If you are asked to write the explicit probability formula for some situation though and it's expected to be able to shift between writing in terms of counting the failures versus counting the successes, then you will probably be looking into the fine print but it is a bit overkill for this question I suppose.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top