Probability proof - what formulas are needed here?

SavvyAA3
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If events A and B are in the same sample space:
  • .
Proove that if P(A I B') > P(A) then P(B I A) < P(B)

(where B' is the Probability of A given not B)


  • .
Proove that if P(A I B) = P(A) then P(B I A) = P(B)

do we assume independence here so that P(A I B) = [P(A)*P(B)]/ P(B) = P(A) and state that since P(A n B) = P(B n A) that P(B I A) = [P(B)*P(A)] / P(A) = P(B) or is it wrong to assume independence here?
 
on Phys.org
For the second proof use the fact that P(A|B)=P(A&B)/P(B) and similarly for the other one. You can't assume independence, but it is easy to see that they are using the usual definition of independence P(A&B)=P(A)P(B).
 
Please could you show me the steps you would take
 
SavvyAA3 said:
If events A and B are in the same sample space:
  • .
Proove that if P(A I B') > P(A) then P(B I A) < P(B)

(where B' is the Probability of A given not B)

...

assume
[tex]P(A|B')>P(A)[/tex]
then

[tex]\frac{P(A\cap B')}{P(B')}>P(A)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{P(B'|A)P(A)}{P(B')}>P(A)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{P(B'|A)}{P(B')}>1[/tex]

[tex]P(B'|A)>P(B')[/tex]

[tex]1-P(B'|A)<1-P(B')[/tex]

[tex]P(B|A)<P(B)[/tex]

the other one isn't much different
 
Thanks soo much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
30K