Probability Question: No Couples in Randomly Split Groups of Four Couples

  • Thread starter Thread starter mistermath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The probability of randomly splitting four couples into groups of two without pairing any couples together is calculated using derangements. The established solution indicates that the probability is 37.5%, which can also be expressed as 1 - 0.375. The total arrangements of the eight individuals can be computed as 8! / (2!2!2!2!) or equivalently as 8C2 * 6C2 * 4C2 * 2C2. The correct method to find the probability of no couples being paired is through the formula D(4)/4!, where D(4) represents the number of derangements for four objects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics, specifically permutations and combinations.
  • Familiarity with the concept of derangements in probability theory.
  • Basic knowledge of factorial notation and its applications in probability calculations.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical equations and expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of derangements and how to calculate D(n) for various values of n.
  • Learn about advanced combinatorial techniques, including inclusion-exclusion principles.
  • Explore practical applications of probability theory in real-world scenarios.
  • Review mathematical proofs related to permutations and combinations for deeper understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in probability theory and combinatorial analysis will benefit from this discussion.

mistermath
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four couples go to a party. They decide to split randomly into groups of 2. What is the probability that no group has a couple that came together.


Homework Equations


I actually have an MS in math; feel free to use mathematics at any level. The answer is supposed to be 37.5% or 1-37.5 I have forgotten.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried several different approaches.

First: Total ways possible is 8! / 2!2!2!2! OR you can do: 8C2 * 6C2 * 4C2 * 2C2 (which is the same thing); I believe this is correct.

Total ways of getting no couples (this part is incorrect). 7P6 * 5P4 * 3P2 * 1P1 = 7*5*3*1.

Second: There are 8 people, label them 1-8. 1,2 = couple, 3,4 = couple, 5,6 = couple, 7,8 = couple. This gives us 28 different combinations of couples that are possible. 7+6+5+4+3+2+1(because 1 can be paired with 2-8 = 7 ways, 2 can be paired with 3-8 = 6 etc).

But I can't figure out all the different cases; mostly because I don't want to do it this way. I feel like there should be an easier way to solve this that I'm over looking. The book solves this problem by setting up an experiment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you can solve for the probability of the complement instead more easily.
 
vela said:
Perhaps you can solve for the probability of the complement instead more easily.

The problem with looking at the complement is that it makes it even harder. The complement of none is at least 1. In this case, you'd need 1-P(One couple)+P(Two Couples)+P(Three Couples) + P(4 Couples).

But ouch, P(3 Couples).. what's that mean? Is it possible to have 3 couples and the 4th set not being a couple? nope cannot. So how do we handle that.
 
That just means P(3) and P(4) aren't independent, so you can't just add the individual probabilities to get P(3 or 4).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K