Probability/Schrodinger's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter NicolasM
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability of finding an electron within a sphere of radius 2ao for a hydrogen atom in its ground state. The proposed formula, 0∫2α 4πr3ψ2dr/3 x100%, is incorrect due to dimensional inconsistencies. The correct approach involves using the three-dimensional integral of |ψ|2, emphasizing the need for a proper differential factor in the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wave functions.
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its applications.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates in three-dimensional integrals.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the hydrogen atom wave function from the Schrödinger equation.
  • Learn about probability density functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the application of spherical coordinates in quantum mechanical problems.
  • Investigate dimensional analysis in physical equations to ensure correctness.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, as well as educators teaching the principles of atomic structure and wave functions.

NicolasM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We have a hydrogen atom in its ground state. What is the probability of an electron being found within a sphere (with nucleus being the origin) of a radius of 2a_{o}\ =\ 0.5291772083(19)\ \times\ 10^{-10}α\ m?

Would 0 4πr3ψ2dr/3 x100% be correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NicolasM said:
We have a hydrogen atom in its ground state. What is the probability of an electron being found within a sphere (with nucleus being the origin) of a radius of 2a_{o}\ =\ 0.5291772083(19)\ \times\ 10^{-10}α\ m?

Would 0 4πr3ψ2dr/3 x100% be correct?

No, it wouldn't even have correct dimensions. Why do you think that's right? Work it out from the three dimensional integral of |ψ|^2. Your differential factor is wrong.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K