MHB Problem Chinese remainder Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves finding solutions for the equation \(x=x(r,s,t)\) where the intersection of the sets defined by \(r\), \(s\), and \(t\) is equal to \(x+n\mathbb{N}\). Participants clarify that \(n\) is the least common multiple of 2, 3, and 5, which is 30. The discussion focuses on determining the set of solutions that satisfy this condition. Understanding the role of the least common multiple is crucial for solving the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clearly defining parameters in mathematical problems.
Julio1
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Find the set of solutions $x=x(r,s,t)$ such that $(r+2\mathbb{N})\cap (s+3\mathbb{N})\cap (t+5\mathbb{N})=x+n\mathbb{N}.$

Hello MHB :). Any hints for the problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Julio,

Could you specify what $n$ is? Is it $30$?
 
Euge said:
Hi Julio,

Could you specify what $n$ is? Is it $30$?

Hi Euge :).

Yes, $n=\text{lcm}(2,3,5)=30.$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top