Problem figuring out on how to create a scoring sytem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter douglasrac
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on creating a scoring system that evaluates individuals based on three criteria: A, B, and C, with respective weightings of 30%, 40%, and 30%. The initial method of scoring led to imbalanced results due to differing point ranges for each criterion. The solution involves calculating the percentage of possible points for each criterion using the formula (S + min)/(max - min), allowing for a more equitable final score. This approach results in a total score that accurately reflects the importance of each criterion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scoring systems and weighted averages
  • Familiarity with basic mathematical formulas
  • Knowledge of percentage calculations
  • Experience with data normalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Data normalization techniques in scoring systems"
  • Learn about "Weighted scoring models in decision making"
  • Explore "Mathematical formulas for equitable scoring"
  • Investigate "Best practices for designing evaluation criteria"
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for data analysts, scoring system designers, and anyone involved in performance evaluation or assessment methodologies.

douglasrac
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm creating a scoring system but I think the whole base of it is wrong and I don't know how to fix it.

It's simple. There are 3 criteria: A, B and C. I will evaluate people in those 3 criteria and attribute points to it.

Criteria A need to be 30% of total
Criteria B need to be 40% of total
Criteria C need to be 30% of total

So what I do is attribute points and then multiple by 30% or 40% and then sum them all.
The problem is that those criteria do not have the same amount of points.

Criteria A can go from 0 to 6.
Criteria B can go from 100 to 600.
Criteria C can go from -2 to 2.

So when I sum them, it doesn't make any sense. For example:

John got 5 on A, 400 on B and 1 on C.
So:
A: 5*0.3 = 1.5
B: 400*0.4 = 160
C: 1*0.3 = 0.3
Total: 161.8

This way doesn't seem that criteria A is having the same importance of criteria B, or at least only 10% less importance.
How can I make that work? Because it's impossible to have same scoring system for all criteria, but somehow the final score should reflect all criteria as almost equal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the percentage of possible points for each stat, then multiply by the percentage of the total score. That's confusing, so I'll give an example.

For A = 5, B = 400, C = 1:
A is 83.333...% of its possible points. Computed by 5/6.
B is 80% of its possible points. Computed by 400/500.
C is 75% of its possible points. Computed by 3/4.

The general formula for a stat named S is (S + min)/(max - min) where S is the number of points for the S stat, min is the minimum number of points, and max is the maximum.

You can then take those values, and plug them into the formula you were using.

83.333... * .3 + 80 * .4 + 75 * .3 = 79.4999... on a scale of 1 to 100.
 
Last edited:
Thanks! That solved my problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K