Problem involving m-tail of a sequence

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the product of sequences, specifically examining whether the m-tail of a sequence \(X\) multiplied by another sequence \(Y\) converges given that the product of the original sequences \(XY\) converges. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and proof validation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a proof that if \(XY\) converges, then \(X_mY\) also converges, based on the definition of the m-tail of \(X\).
  • Another participant argues that the result is not universally true without additional conditions, providing a counterexample with specific sequences \(X\) and \(Y\) that converge while \(X_mY\) diverges under certain conditions.
  • A participant suggests that the notation should be \(X_m Y_m\) instead of \(X_m Y\).
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in their original proof and seeks clarification on which step fails, noting that they were trying to use this result in another proof.
  • Another participant points out that the sequence \(X_mY\) is interpreted differently than the original sequence product \(XY\), emphasizing the distinction in terms of sequence indices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the initial proof, with some asserting that the conclusion does not hold without additional conditions, while others are attempting to clarify and refine the argument. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which the convergence statement is valid.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the sequences \(X\) and \(Y\), particularly regarding their convergence properties and the implications of using the m-tail. The discussion also highlights potential misinterpretations of sequence multiplication.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
HelloI want to prove the following.
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be two sequences,and \(XY\) converges. Then prove that
\(X_mY\) also converges,where
\[ X_m = \mbox{ m-tail of X } = (x_{m+n}\;:\; n\in \mathbb{N}) \]
Here is my proof.
let \(\lim\;(XY) = a \) . Then we have
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0\; \exists K_1 \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K_1 \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
Now let \(K = \max(K_1,\; m+1) \). The \( \forall n \geqslant K \) we have
\[|x_n y_n - a| < \varepsilon \].
But now all the \( (x_n) \) terms are values from the sequence \(X_m\). So
we have proven that
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0 \;\exists K \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
where \( x_n\) values are from sequence \(X_m\). This proves that
\[ \lim(X_m Y) = a \]which proves that \(X_mY\) also converges. Let me know if this is right
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
I want to prove the following.
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be two sequences, and \(XY\) converges. Then prove that
\(X_mY\) also converges,where
\[ X_m = \mbox{ m-tail of X } = (x_{m+n}\;:\; n\in \mathbb{N}) \]
This result is not true unless the sequences satisfy some additional conditions. For example, suppose that the sequences $X$ and $Y$ are given by $$X = (0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,\ldots), \qquad Y = (1,0,2,0,3,0,4,0,\ldots).$$ Then the sequence $XY$ consists entirely of zeros, and therefore converges. But if $m$ is an odd number then the sequence $X_mY$ is the same as $Y$, and it diverges.
 
I think that should be $$X_m Y_m $$ .
 
Thanks Opalg

I see the mistake. But I am trying to see which step in my proof fails. I was trying to prove this result for using in another proof. And I just checked that another problem and it says that \(X\) does converge to some non zero number.

So which step fails in my proof.

Thanks
 
IssacNewton said:
So
we have proven that
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0 \;\exists K \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
where \( x_n\) values are from sequence \(X_m\). This proves that
\[ \lim(X_m Y) = a \]
The sequence $(x_ny_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ is $XY$ and not $X_mY$, assuming I interpret multiplication of sequences right. Then $X_mY$ is $(x_{m+n}y_n)_{n=1}^\infty$.
 
Hello Makarov,

Like I said, I made mistake in stating the problem. Thanks for pointing that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K