Problem involving m-tail of a sequence

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the product of sequences \(X_m\) and \(Y\), where \(X_m\) is defined as the m-tail of sequence \(X\). The original proof attempted to show that if \(XY\) converges, then \(X_mY\) also converges. However, it was established that this result is not universally true without additional conditions on the sequences. A counterexample involving sequences \(X\) and \(Y\) demonstrated that \(X_mY\) can diverge when \(m\) is odd, despite \(XY\) converging.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequence convergence in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of m-tails in sequences
  • Knowledge of limits and epsilon-delta definitions
  • Basic operations on sequences, including multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convergent sequences and their products
  • Explore the concept of m-tails in greater depth
  • Learn about counterexamples in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate conditions under which products of sequences converge
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematical analysis, and anyone interested in sequence convergence and proof techniques in real analysis.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
HelloI want to prove the following.
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be two sequences,and \(XY\) converges. Then prove that
\(X_mY\) also converges,where
\[ X_m = \mbox{ m-tail of X } = (x_{m+n}\;:\; n\in \mathbb{N}) \]
Here is my proof.
let \(\lim\;(XY) = a \) . Then we have
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0\; \exists K_1 \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K_1 \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
Now let \(K = \max(K_1,\; m+1) \). The \( \forall n \geqslant K \) we have
\[|x_n y_n - a| < \varepsilon \].
But now all the \( (x_n) \) terms are values from the sequence \(X_m\). So
we have proven that
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0 \;\exists K \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
where \( x_n\) values are from sequence \(X_m\). This proves that
\[ \lim(X_m Y) = a \]which proves that \(X_mY\) also converges. Let me know if this is right
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
I want to prove the following.
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be two sequences, and \(XY\) converges. Then prove that
\(X_mY\) also converges,where
\[ X_m = \mbox{ m-tail of X } = (x_{m+n}\;:\; n\in \mathbb{N}) \]
This result is not true unless the sequences satisfy some additional conditions. For example, suppose that the sequences $X$ and $Y$ are given by $$X = (0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,\ldots), \qquad Y = (1,0,2,0,3,0,4,0,\ldots).$$ Then the sequence $XY$ consists entirely of zeros, and therefore converges. But if $m$ is an odd number then the sequence $X_mY$ is the same as $Y$, and it diverges.
 
I think that should be $$X_m Y_m $$ .
 
Thanks Opalg

I see the mistake. But I am trying to see which step in my proof fails. I was trying to prove this result for using in another proof. And I just checked that another problem and it says that \(X\) does converge to some non zero number.

So which step fails in my proof.

Thanks
 
IssacNewton said:
So
we have proven that
\[ \forall \varepsilon >0 \;\exists K \in \mathbb{N} \;\forall n\geqslant K \]
\[ |x_ny_n - a| < \varepsilon \]
where \( x_n\) values are from sequence \(X_m\). This proves that
\[ \lim(X_m Y) = a \]
The sequence $(x_ny_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ is $XY$ and not $X_mY$, assuming I interpret multiplication of sequences right. Then $X_mY$ is $(x_{m+n}y_n)_{n=1}^\infty$.
 
Hello Makarov,

Like I said, I made mistake in stating the problem. Thanks for pointing that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K