# Problem involving unit vectors

Gold Member
TL;DR Summary
Why is i cap. -i cap producing two values?
For example is this correct : 19icap.4(-i cap) = 76(i.-i)= 76
Or is it , take - out. Then -76(icap.icap)= -76
Is it -76 or 76 ?

Mentor
2022 Award
Gold Member
i^⋅i^=−1
But cos 0=1 and magnitude of i is also 1. So how is it -1?

Mentor
2022 Award
But cos 0=1 and magnitude of i is also 1. So how is it -1?
Because ##\hat{i}## solves the real equation
$$\hat{i}^2 \sim \begin{bmatrix} 0\\1 \end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix} 0\\1 \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} -1\\0 \end{bmatrix}$$
which makes the difference between ##\mathbb{C}## and ##\mathbb{R}^2##. We also have a direction, not only magnitude, and we have a multiplication ##\hat{i}^2 \in \mathbb{R}.##

Homework Helper
Gold Member
It seems that this $\hat i$ means the complex unit , not the unit-vector along the $x$-axis.
In that context, it seems the $\hat{\phantom{QQ}}$ is unnecessary, and potentially confusing at first glance.

Furthermore, it seems this dot operation is complex multiplication, not the familiar Euclidean dot product over a real vector space.

Gold Member
It seems that this $\hat i$ means the complex unit , not the unit-vector along the $x$-axis.
In that context, it seems the $\hat{\phantom{QQ}}$ is unnecessary, and potentially confusing at first glance.

Furthermore, it seems this dot operation is complex multiplication, not the familiar Euclidean dot product over a real vector space.
But I am talking about simple dot product and unit vectors only.

Homework Helper
Gold Member
But I am talking about simple dot product and unit vectors only.
Is $\hat \imath$ akin to the complex unit? (It's hard to parse your original post.)

Gold Member
Is ı^ akin to the complex unit?
I don’t know anything about complex units.

Mentor
2022 Award
I don’t know anything about complex units.
The question is whether you consider ##\hat{i}## as the vector ##(0,1)## in the complex plane, or the complex number ## i ##. Not that it makes much difference, but complex numbers are more than just a real vector.

Gold Member
The question is whether you consider ##\hat{i}## as the vector ##(0,1)## in the complex plane, or the complex number ## i ##. Not that it makes much difference, but complex numbers are more than just a real vector.
Yah! As a vector. I don’t know what ^ is called where you are but it’s called as cap.

Mentor
2022 Award
Yah! As a vector. I don’t know what ^ is called where you are but it’s called as cap.

The notations ##\hat{i}\, , \,\hat{j}\, , \,\hat{k}## are sometimes used in physics to name the three Euclidean directions in space. In that case, we only have
$$\hat{i}\cdot \hat{i} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}=1$$
But if ##\hat{i}## is a complex number, a vector in the complex number plane, then we have
$$\hat{i}\cdot\hat{i}=\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}=-\hat{1}$$

So all depends on what you mean by ##\hat{i},## i.e. the context you took your formula from.

Gold Member
The notations i^,j^,k^ are sometimes used in physics to name the three Euclidean directions in space. In that case, we only have
a.b= mod of a* mod of b* cos theta
Mod means magnitude in physics!
What is i^.-i^?
I am confused what will be the mod of -i^. Is it -1 or 1?
I guess magnitude of -i^ will be -1.

Mentor
2022 Award
a.b= mod of a* mod of b* cos theta
Mod means magnitude in physics!
What is i^.-i^?
I am confused what will be the mod of -i^. Is it -1 or 1?
I guess magnitude of -i^ will be -1.
Sounds like ##|a\cdot b|=|a|\cdot|b|\cdot\cos \theta## to me, i.e. "what is the modulus of the product" not what is the product itself which would be $$i \cdot i = | i |\cdot | i |\cdot (\cos (\pi/2+\pi/2)+ i \cdot \sin (\pi/2+\pi/2))=1\cdot 1\cdot (-1 + i \cdot 0)=-1$$

Gold Member
Sounds like ##|a\cdot b|=|a|\cdot|b|\cdot\cos \theta## to me, i.e. "what is the modulus of the product" not what is the product itself which would be $$i \cdot i = | i |\cdot | i |\cdot (\cos (\pi/2+\pi/2)+ i \cdot \sin (\pi/2+\pi/2))=1\cdot 1\cdot (-1 + i \cdot 0)=-1$$
When we find dot product of two vectors what should we take ,mod of vectors ?
Also what does mod do to a vector? Does it give the magnitude? If yes, what will be the mod of -i^?

Mentor
2022 Award
When we find dot product of two vectors what should we take ,mod of vectors ?
Also what does mod do to a vector? Does it give the magnitude? If yes, what will be the mod of -i^?
Yes, the dot product (scalar product, inner product) goes like ##\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=|\vec{a}|\cdot|\vec{b}|\cdot\cos(\sphericalangle (\vec{a},\vec{b})).## In that case we have
$$\hat{i}^2=(1,0)\cdot (1,0)= |(1,0)|\cdot|(1,0)|\cdot\cos(0)=1$$
The result is a number. In that case the problem has nothing to do with complex numbers. ##\hat{i}## is only the short form for ##(1,0,0)## or whatever the number of dimensions is.

Gold Member
Yes, the dot product (scalar product, inner product) goes like a→⋅b→=|a→|⋅|b→|⋅cos⁡(∢(a→,b→)). In that case we have
What if it’s dot product of i^.-i^ instead of i^.i^. What will be the answer?

Mentor
2022 Award
What if it’s dot product of i^.-i^ instead of i^.i^. What will be the answer?
$$(\hat{i}) \cdot (-\hat{i})=|\hat{i}|\cdot|-\hat{i}|\cdot\cos(\pi) =1\cdot 1\cdot (-1)=-1$$

Gold Member
$$(\hat{i}) \cdot (-\hat{i})=|\hat{i}|\cdot|-\hat{i}|\cdot\cos(\pi) =1\cdot 1\cdot (-1)=-1$$
But the magnitude of -i^ is -1.

Mentor
2022 Award
But the magnitude of -i^ is -1.
The magnitude is the length. And the lengths of ##\hat{i}## and ##-\hat{i}## is ##1## in both cases. Only the direction is opposite of the other.

The notation with ## i ## is very confusing in this context.

Gold Member
The magnitude is the length. And the lengths of ##\hat{i}## and ##-\hat{i}## is ##1## in both cases. Only the direction is opposite of the other.

The notation with ## i ## is very confusing in this context.
So back to OP. It will be -76 in both cases, whether we operate minus with dot product or we take out minus in the beginning.

Mentor
2022 Award
Yes, assuming that the complex numbers are off the table.

• rudransh verma
Mentor
But cos 0=1 and magnitude of i is also 1. So how is it -1?

The notations ##\hat{i}\, , \,\hat{j}\, , \,\hat{k}## are sometimes used in physics to name the three Euclidean directions in space. In that case, we only have
$$\hat{i}\cdot \hat{i} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}=1$$
No, in that case it would be
$$\hat{i}\cdot \hat{i} = \begin{bmatrix}1 \\0\\0\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}=1$$
You're still thinking of i as being the imaginary unit, but being represented as a vector.
fresh_42 said:
But if ##\hat{i}## is a complex number, a vector in the complex number plane, then we have
$$\hat{i}\cdot\hat{i}=\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}=-\hat{1}$$

So all depends on what you mean by ##\hat{i},## i.e. the context you took your formula from.

Mentor
2022 Award
No, in that case it would be
$$\hat{i}\cdot \hat{i} = \begin{bmatrix}1 \\0\\0\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}=1$$
You're still thinking of i as being the imaginary unit, but being represented as a vector.
No, I did not. I only changed the order to make the product look equal to the second one, emphasizing the different RHS by equal LHS. Since nobody ever used the words basis or dimension, I felt free to choose one where ##\hat{i}=(0,1)## and dimension is two. I mentioned the possibly three-dimensional case in another post.

Mentor
No, I did not. I only changed the order to make the product look equal to the second one, emphasizing the different RHS by equal LHS.
Leading up to what I quoted, you wrote this:
The notations i^,j^,k^ are sometimes used in physics to name the three Euclidean directions in space. In that case, we only have $$\hat{i}\cdot \hat{i} = \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}\cdot \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}=1$$
So the context here was ##\mathbb R^3## with the standard basis vectors i, j, and k, all of which have three components. And as I'm sure you know, i has 1 in its first component, and 0 in the other two.

Mentor
2022 Award
There was still the possibility of quaternions, in which case ##\hat{i}^2=\hat{j}^2=-1.##
I decided to demonstrate the different multiplications, not a specific use. Mainly because I was still guessing what exactly has been meant.

Mentor
There was still the possibility of quaternions
In which case you would have needed four coordinates, not two.

Mentor
2022 Award
In which case you would have needed four coordinates, not two.
Such things happen when you need more than a dozen posts only to figure out what might have been meant.