Problem of solving the cubic function

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Martin Zhao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for solving cubic functions in general form, specifically the equation y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d. Participants explore various approaches, including analytical and numerical techniques, as well as software tools.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about solving cubic functions and suggests it may be similar to quartic functions.
  • Another participant provides a link to a Wikipedia article on cubic functions, implying it contains relevant information.
  • Multiple participants propose plotting the cubic function using software like Maple, MATLAB, or Mathematica to locate roots, followed by factoring the cubic to find remaining roots.
  • One participant mentions numerical techniques, such as Newton's method, for approximating roots to a high degree of accuracy.
  • A different approach is suggested involving the substitution x = z + \frac{\gamma}{z}, with a caution about the limitations of this method and the need for careful verification of solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present various methods for solving cubic functions, but there is no consensus on a single best approach. Multiple competing views and techniques remain under discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some methods discussed may depend on specific assumptions, such as the choice of the constant \gamma in the substitution method. Additionally, the effectiveness of numerical methods may vary based on the context of the problem.

Martin Zhao
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Guys, I may need your help. There is a question saying that how to solve the cubic function in general form, which means that y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d. How do you guys solve for x? To be honest, I have no idea of this question. Probably, it uses the same way as the quartic function. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are numerous ways of solving cubic functions, but the most efficient way would be to plot it using some type of software--most easily maple, MATLAB, or Mathematica. Once you do that, locate one of the roots. Use the root as a factor, and divide the cubic by that factor to obtain a quadratic. Quadratics are easy to solve, thus you can easily find the remaining two roots.
 
AMenendez said:
There are numerous ways of solving cubic functions, but the most efficient way would be to plot it using some type of software--most easily maple, MATLAB, or Mathematica. Once you do that, locate one of the roots. Use the root as a factor, and divide the cubic by that factor to obtain a quadratic. Quadratics are easy to solve, thus you can easily find the remaining two roots.

Well, if you're going to be content with numerical answers, then there are many good techniques to approximate the roots to a very high degree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_method
 
For the cubic equation ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 (in your case the constant term is d-y, not d), try substituting x = z +\frac{\gamma}{z}, and solve for z by choosing the constant \gamma correctly. If fairly certain that for a good choice of \gamma (it will become apparent what \gamma must be) you will end up with a quadratic function in z^2.

This way you may arrive at the formula yourself, it's a neat exercise. You probably need to be careful verifying your solution afterwards, as z +\frac{\gamma}{z} is not defined everywhere, and does not attain all values. To make calculations easier, you can assume a = 1 first, and make the necessary modification afterwards.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K