Is Every Convex Function Differentiable at Most Points?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differentiability of convex functions, specifically that a convex function \( f : (a,b) \to \mathbb{R} \) is differentiable at all but countably many points and that its derivative is nondecreasing. Key points include the existence of left and right derivatives, which are also nondecreasing, and the identification of discontinuous points in the derivative as those where a jump occurs between the left and right derivatives. The set of points where the derivative is not defined is countable, as demonstrated by constructing an injection from these points to the rational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convex functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with left and right derivatives
  • Knowledge of countability in set theory
  • Basic concepts of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convex functions in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the Mean Value Theorem for convex functions
  • Explore the concept of nondecreasing functions and their applications
  • Investigate the relationship between differentiability and continuity in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of convex functions and their derivatives.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Suppose $f : (a,b) \to \Bbb R$ is a convex function. Show that $f$ is differentiable at all but countably many points and the derivative is nondecreasing.

-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some starting steps. I don't have a proof, but I suspect these are necessary and will come back if I finish it

A convex function is one where if you draw a line connecting two points on the graph ##a=(x_1, f(x_1))## and ##b=(x_2, f(x_2))## then all the points ##c=(x_3, f(x_3))## lie on or below the line. Note this also means if ##x_3>x_2##, then ##c## must lie on or above the line, as the line connecting ##a## and ##c## has ##b## on our below it, so ##a-c## has at least as large a slope as ##a-b## does. Similarly if ##x_3<x_1## then ##c## lies above the line.

In particular this means as you connect a specific value ##x,f(x)## to ##z,f(z)## for fixed ##x##, the slope is a non decreasing function in ##z##(even crossing ##x##). We will use this last fact a lot.

Claim: right derivatives and left derivatives always exist.
consider ##\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}## for positive ##h##. This is the slope of the line connecting the graph between ##x## and ##x+h##. By convexity this is decreasing. It is also bounded from below. If it gets arbitrarily negative, then ##f## cannot satisfy convexity to the left of ##x_0## - picking any point to the left of ##x_0## and computing the slope connecting it to ##x_0## gives a slope that must be at least as small as all the slopes when connecting to the right.

Hence the limit exists as the slope decreases as ##h## goes to zero, and it has a lower bound Similarly the limit from the left (negative ##h## going to 0) must exist

Also, the left and right derivatives are non decreasing. Even better, we have the left derivative at ##x## is not larger than the right derivative at ##x##, and if ##z>x##, the left derivative at ##z## is at least as large as the right derivative at ##x##
by convexity ##\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}## is an increasing function in ##h##, hence is larger for when ##h## is positive than when it's negative. Hence the right derivative must be larger than the left.

Now consider for ##0<h<(z-x)/2##,

##\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}##, ##\frac{f(z-h)-f(x+h)}{z-x-2h}## and
##\frac{f(z)-f(z-h)}{h}##.

These are the three slopes of the lines connecting ##x## and ##x+h##, ##x+h## and ##z-h##, and ##z-h## and ##z##. By convexity and comparing slopes connected to ##x+h##, the first is no larger than the second, and by comparing slopes connected to ##z-h##, the second is no larger than the third. So the third is at least as large as the first. The right derivative at ##x## is the limit of the first as ##h## goes to zero, and the left derivative at ##z## is the limit of the third, proving the right derivative at ##x## is less than or equal to the left derivative at ##z## if ##x<z##
So basically we have a derivative that is non decreasing and defined everywhere except at points where the right derivative is larger than the left derivative, which is where the derivative is not defined, but the non decreasing property continues to hold on the left and right derivatives.

Edit:
Oh here is the last piece. Every discontinuous point in the derivative is when there's a jump at a point between the left and right derivatives. Let ##X## be the set of all such points ##x## where a jump occurs and let ##(l_x,r_x)## be the open interval containing the left and right derivatives. These intervals are non overlapping, since if ##x<y##, ##r_x\let l_y##.
Hence for each interval we can pick a rational number and this gives us an injection from ##X## to ##\mathbb{Q}##, proving ##X## is countable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K