Problem of the Week #91 - February 24th, 2014

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem presented involves a sequence of measurable sets \( A_1 \supseteq A_2 \supseteq A_3 \supseteq \cdots \) with finite measure \( m(A_1) < \infty \). The conclusion established is that the measure of the intersection of these sets is equal to the limit of their measures: \( m\left( \bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i \right) = \lim_{i \to \infty} m(A_i) \). This result is derived using properties of disjoint sets and the additivity of measures, as outlined in Royden's "Real Analysis". The solution was confirmed by user Ackbach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurable sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with measure theory concepts, particularly Lebesgue measure
  • Knowledge of sequences and limits in mathematical analysis
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate set notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lebesgue measure and its properties in detail
  • Learn about the concept of monotonicity in measure theory
  • Explore the implications of the Dominated Convergence Theorem
  • Review examples of measurable sets and their intersections in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on real analysis, measure theory, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of measurable sets and their properties.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem
: Suppose that $A_1\supseteq A_2\supseteq A_3\supseteq\cdots\supseteq A_n\cdots$ is a sequence of measurable sets with $m\left(A_1\right)<\infty$. Show that $$m\left( \bigcap\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}A_i\right) =\lim\limits_{i\to\infty}m\left(A_i\right).$$

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Ackbach (quoting Royden as his source). You can find his solution below.

[sp]I freely admit that I am essentially stealing this solution lock, stock, and barrel from Royden's Real Analysis, page 63. I'm only changing the notation, since I despise Royden's set notation. His setminus is a $\sim$, and he notates the measure of $A$ by $mA$. I will use $-$ for setminus, and the measure of $A$ by $m(A)$.

Let
$$\displaystyle A=\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i},$$
and let $B_{i}=A_{i} - A_{i+1}$. Then
$$A_{1} - A = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_{i},$$
and the sets $B_{i}$ are pairwise disjoint.
Hence
$$m(A_{1} - A)= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}m(B_{i})= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}m(A_{i} - A_{i+1}).$$

But $m(A_{1})=m(A)+m(A_{1} - A),$ and $m(A_{i})=m(A_{i+1})+m(A_{i} - A_{i+1}),$ since $A \subseteq A_{1}$ and $A_{i+1} \subseteq A_{i}$.
Since $m(A_{i}) \le m(A_{1}) < \infty,$ we have $m(A_1 - A)=m(A_1)-m(A)$ and
$m(A_1 - A_{i+1})=m(A_i)-m(A_{i+1}).$

Thus

\begin{align*}
m(A_1)-m(A)&= \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}[m(A_i)-m(A_{i+1})] \\
&= \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n}[m(A_i)-m(A_{i+1})] \\
&= \lim_{n \to \infty}[m(A_1)-m(A_n)] \\
&=m(A_1)- \lim_{n \to \infty}m(A_n).
\end{align*}

Since $m(A_1)< \infty,$ we have $\displaystyle m(A)= \lim_{n \to \infty}m(A_n).$[/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K