MHB Problem of the Week #96 - January 27th, 2014

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials, specifically showing that the integral of the product of two different Legendre polynomials over the interval [-1, 1] is zero, while the integral of the square of a Legendre polynomial is a specific positive value. The proof involves using Legendre's differential equation and integration by parts to derive the orthogonality condition for the case where the indices are different (m ≠ n). For the case where the indices are the same (m = n), recurrence relations are utilized to establish the integral's value. The final result confirms that the integral of the product of Legendre polynomials behaves as expected based on their orthogonality properties.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks again to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem: For $n\geq 0$, let $P_n(x)$ denote the Legendre polynomial. Show that
\[\int_{-1}^1 P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx = \begin{cases}0 & m\neq n\\ \dfrac{2}{2n+1} & m=n\end{cases}\]

-----

Hints for the $m\neq n$ case: [sp]Start with Legendre's differential equation \[(1-x^2)y^{\prime\prime} -2xy^{\prime}+\lambda(\lambda+1)y = 0\]
and rewrite it in the form
\[[(1-x^2)y^{\prime}]^{\prime} = -\lambda(\lambda+1)y.\tag{1}\] Then use the fact that $P_m(x)$ and $P_n(x)$ are solutions to this equation with $\lambda=m$ and $\lambda=n$ respectively, and substitute them into $(1)$. From there, find a way to combine these two equations in order to make $P_m(x)P_n(x)$ appear and then integrate to get the result.[/sp]Hints for the $m=n$ case: [sp]First find a way to combine the two recurrence relations (which follow from Bonnet's recurrence relation)
\[(n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x) = (2n+1)xP_n(x)\]
and
\[nP_n(x) + (n-1)P_{n-2}(x) = (2n-1)xP_{n-1}(x)\]
and then use the $m\neq n$ integral result to come up with a recurrence relation involving $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_n^2(x)\,dx$ and $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_{n-1}^2(x)\,dx$. Finally, use the fact that $P_0(x)=1$ and induction to show that $\displaystyle\int_{-1}^1 P_n^2(x)\,dx = \frac{2}{2n+1}$[/sp]

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by MarkFL and chisigma (I have no idea why I didn't see that the first time). You can find Mark's solution below.

[sp]The first case - $m\ne n$:

Let's begin with Legendre's differential equation for $P_m(x)$ in the form:

$$\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]+m(m+1)P_m(x)=0$$

Multiplying through by $$P_n(x)$$ and integrating with respect to $x$ using the given limits $-1$ and $1$, we obtain:

(1) $$\int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx+m(m+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

The first integral may be integrated using integration by parts, where:

$$u=P_n(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx$$

$$dv=\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx\,\therefore\,v=\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)$$

And so we may state:

$$\int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx=\left[P_n(x)\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]_{-1}^{1}-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx$$

We see that the first term on the right evaluates to zero, hence we are left with:

$$\int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x)\frac{d}{dx}\left[\left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x) \right]\,dx=-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx$$

Thus (1) becomes:

(2) $$-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx+m(m+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

If we had begun with the Legendre differential equation for $$P_n(x)$$ instead, and multiplied through by $P_m(x)$, and followed the sames steps as above, we would of course obtain:

(3) $$-\int_{-1}^{1} \left(1-x^2 \right)\frac{d}{dx}P_m(x)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\,dx+n(n+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

Subtracting (3) from (2), there results:

$$\left(m(m+1)-n(n+1) \right)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

Now, if we observe that:

$$m(m+1)-n(n+1)=m^2+m-n^2-n=m^2+mn+m-mn-n^2-n=(m-n)(m+n+1)$$

we may now write

$$(m-n)(m+n+1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

Since $$m\ne n$$ and we must have $$m+n+1>0$$ we may divide through by $$(m-n)(m+n+1)$$ to obtain the desired result:

(4) $$\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=0$$

The second case - $m=n$:

Let's begin with the forms of Bonnet's recurrence relation:

$$nP_n(x)+(n-1)P_{n-2}(x)=(2n-1)xP_{n-1}(x)$$

$$(n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x)=(2n+1)xP_n(x)$$

Solving both for $x$, and equating the results, we obtain:

$$\frac{nP_n(x)+(n-1)P_{n-2}(x)}{(2n-1)P_{n-1}(x)}=\frac{(n+1)P_{n+1}(x)+nP_{n-1}(x)}{(2n+1)P_n(x)}$$

Cross-multiplication yields:

$$n(2n+1)P_n^2(x)+(n-1)(2n+1)P_{n-2}(x)P_n(x)=(n+1)(2n-1)P_{n-1}P_{n+1}(x)+n(2n-1)P_{n-1}^2(x)$$

Integrating with respect to $x$, and using the result in (4), we obtain after dividing through by $$1\le n$$:

(5) $$(2n+1)\int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx=(2n-1)\int_{-1}^{1} P_{n-1}^2(x)\,dx$$

Now, let's define:

$$A_{n}\equiv \int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx$$

Thus, with this definition, (5) may be expressed as the recursion:

(6) $$A_{n}=\frac{2n-1}{2n+1}A_{n-1}$$

Using the fact that $$P_0(x)=1$$, we obtain:

$$A_{0}= \int_{-1}^{1} \,dx=2$$

Hence, we find the following:

$$A_{1}=\frac{1}{3}\cdot2=\frac{2}{3}=\frac{2}{2(1)+1}$$

$$A_{2}=\frac{3}{5}\cdot\frac{2}{3}=\frac{2}{5}= \frac{2}{2(2)+1}$$

Thus, based on the developing pattern, we may state the following induction hypothesis $P_{n}$ (having already shown the base case $P_1$ is true):

$$A_{n}=\frac{2}{2n+1}$$

Now, the recursion we found in (6) may be written with $n+1$ instead of $n$ as:

(7) $$A_{n+1}=\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}A_{n}$$

Thus, as our induction step, we may multiply through the induction hypothesis $P_{n}$ by $$\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}$$ to obtain:

$$\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}A_{n}=\frac{2}{2n+1}\cdot\frac{2n+1}{2n+3}$$

Using (7) on the left side, and simplifying the right side, there results:

$$A_{n+1}=\frac{2}{2(n+1)+1}$$

We have derived $P_{n+1}$ from $P_{n}$, thereby completing the proof by induction. Thus, we may state:

(8) $$A_n=\int_{-1}^{1}P_n^2(x)\,dx=\frac{2}{2n+1}$$

Combining the two cases:

Combining our two cases, $m\ne n$ with (4) and $m=n$ with (8), we may now state:

(9) $$\int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,dx=\begin{cases}0 & m\neq n\\ \dfrac{2}{2n+1} & m=n\end{cases}$$ [/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K