MHB Problem Solving: No Idea Where to Start? Hints Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yazan975
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Problem solving
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding a mathematical problem involving two lines, l1 and l2, where essential information about l2 is missing. Participants question the rationale behind the problem's design, suggesting it may be intended to test the ability to identify nonsensical elements in the question. The lack of clarity about point M and its relationship to the lines adds to the frustration. Some contributors imply that the problem may not be suitable for those unprepared for such challenges. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of clear problem statements in mathematical contexts.
Yazan975
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
View attachment 8417

No idea where to start.
Any hints?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 9.02.16 PM-min.png
    Screen Shot 2018-09-17 at 9.02.16 PM-min.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 134
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yazan975 said:
No idea where to start.
WHY were you given the problem then?

Did you miss math classes?
 
Wilmer said:
WHY were you given the problem then?

Did you miss math classes?

It is supposed to test us
 
Yazan975 said:
It is supposed to test us
I had a look at your 1st post; you do not seem ready for this...
 
Perhaps the purpose is to test whether you can recognize non-sense when you see it! The problem refers to two lines, $l_1$ and $l_2$, tells us that $l_1$ is given by px+ py+ r= 0 but nothing at all is said about $l_2$. And the problem asks for the distance from the origin to point M but what in the world is M?

Are we to assume that $l_2$ is the line through the origin perpendicular to $l_2$ and M is the point or intersection? In that case the given solution is correct but why aren't we told that?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top