Problem with reflection and transmission of waves

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of wave reflection and transmission in a system with beads on a string, particularly when multiple reflections occur. The challenge arises when considering the behavior of waves between two beads, leading to an infinite series of reflections that complicate the analysis. The series can be expressed as Y = A(T + TR + TRR + TRRR + ...), highlighting the need to account for phase changes in the calculations. It is noted that summing this series is typically straightforward and yields a resonance curve. In three-dimensional scenarios, symmetry allows for separation of the problem, resulting in solutions known as Fano resonances.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
I will post below an image.
Relevant Equations
There is no actually.
See, to illustrate:
Let's suppose there is an incoming wave by x < 0, what is the problem?

1598017187725.png


It will find a bead in the string, so:

1598017247425.png
, x < 0
1598017267162.png
, x > 0

T and R are the transmitted and reflected coefficients.

Now suppose there is another bead in x = L. The problem is what happens 0 < x < L:

The transmitted wave will be reflected in bead 2, so this reflected wave will be reflected again in the first bead, and so go on...
How to deal with this problem? We really need to deal with this series?

Y = A(T + TR + TRR + TRRR + TRRRR + ...)

(i am just excluding the complex therms to illustrate what i am really asking

notation:

T = transmitted by the first
TR = transmitted by the first, reflected by the second
TRR = transmitted by the first, reflected by the second, reflected by the first
 

Attachments

  • 1598017100869.png
    1598017100869.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 157
  • 1598017224498.png
    1598017224498.png
    578 bytes · Views: 150
  • 1598017406859.png
    1598017406859.png
    852 bytes · Views: 144
  • 1598017421654.png
    1598017421654.png
    802 bytes · Views: 159
  • 1598017506817.png
    1598017506817.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 155
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The things become worst if we imagine a closed room, and a three dimensional wave... So i think i am missing something.
 
Your attachments were difficult to see, so I will pontificate.
The answer is yes you do:
  1. The series need to keep track of phase (i.e. everything is complex)
  2. It is usually trivial to sum and
  3. it produces the resonance curve
I find it some of the most beautiful and simple physics that exists!

In 3D the problem can usually be separated according to symmetry. This gives rise to various solutions, often collectively called Fano resonances. i know (personally) of an excellent treatment of scattering from periodic atomic surfaces with an attractive potential.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K