Process Physics: Examining its Usefulness and Maturity

[dansas]

I have been unable to find this topic discussed in "search forums" [ If it has been, I am deeply sorry].

Is Process Physics useful? Is it mature enough to spend time studying and learning it? What is, so far, the general consensus in the community about its value?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Physics
http://www.scieng.flinders.edu.au/cpes/people/cahill_r/processphysics.html

 

[cesiumfrog]

Never heard of it. The wikipedia article mentions Reg Cahill a few times in the opening, that can't be a good sign.

(The physics community responds that way to people who proclaim that the noise in their cheap motion-through-ether-measuring experiments is actually gravitational wave signals.)

 

[Voltage]

I've previously sat down and read through a 100+ page document on this. In my opinion it started with promise but then spiralled into misconception.

Note that that's just an opinion. I can offer no credentials to back it up, and I can't properly be considered to be part of the physics community.