Hello, first post here.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am preparing for my Introductory Quantum Mechanics course, and in the exam questions, we are asked to use Ehrenfest's theorem to show that

[tex] \frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{r}\cdot \vec{p} \rangle = \langle 2T-\vec{r}\cdot \nabla V \rangle [/tex]

Now, from other results:

[tex] \frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{r} \rangle = \frac{1}{m} \langle \vec{p} \rangle [/tex]

[tex] \frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{p} \rangle = \langle -\nabla V \rangle [/tex]

it can be solved using a product rule of differentiation:

[tex] \frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{r}\cdot \vec{p} \rangle =\frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{r} \rangle \cdot \vec{p} + \vec{r} \cdot \frac{d}{dt}\langle \vec{p} \rangle [/tex]

But I severely doubt this is the right way, or even mathematically sound. So my question is, is the above equation sound, or should I be calculating the commutators with the Hamiltonian, as per Ehrenfest's?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Product rule of derivative of expectation values

Loading...

Similar Threads - Product rule derivative | Date |
---|---|

A Commutator vector product | Jan 29, 2018 |

A I'm getting the wrong inner product of Fock space | Jan 25, 2018 |

B Entanglement and pair-production and annihilation | Jan 24, 2018 |

I Two particle system, products and entanglement | Dec 31, 2017 |

Product rule for derivatives | Apr 23, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**