Projectile motion of a fired cannonball

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the projectile motion of a cannonball fired at an angle, with specific parameters given for initial speed and time of flight. The goal is to determine the height of a cliff where the cannonball lands, while also exploring the speed of the cannonball just before impact.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations to find the height of the cliff and the speed of the cannonball. There is confusion regarding the correct application of acceleration due to gravity and its direction. Some participants question the assumptions made about vertical and horizontal components of motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the need to consider both vertical and horizontal components of motion. There is an exploration of the correct signs for acceleration and the appropriate formulas to use, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that air resistance is ignored, and there is uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the formulas used for calculating velocities and heights. The original poster has provided additional calculations that may or may not be relevant to the main question.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



A cannonball is fired with an initial speed of 90.0 m/s at an angle 45.0 ° above the horizontal (see diagram). The cannonball strikes point A on top of a cliff 8.7 s seconds after being fired. Ignore air resistance in this problem.

How high is the cliff? (correct answer is: 183 meters)


The Attempt at a Solution



v_{iy}=90 sin(45)=63.63

y=v_{iy}t+ \frac{1}{2}(a)t^2=63.63 \times 8.7 + 0.5 (9.81)\times 8.7^2 = 924.8

But why is this wrong? :confused:

P.S. I also know that the the maximum height the cannonball reaches is 206.42 and I have already calculated that point A is 553.66 meters horizontally from the cannon. Not sure if this helps...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you used the formula s = ut + 0.5at^2, the acceleration in this case is in the opposite direction of the motion of the cannonball, so effectively it is decellerating it. So instead of 9.81ms^-2 you need to plug in -9.81ms^-2.
 
I also have another relevant question:

Calculate the speed of the cannonball just before it hits A.

I used the formula v=v_i + at = 90 + (\pm 9.81)8.7

I have tried both 9.81ms-2 and -9.81ms-2, but neither seem to give the correct answer. Am I using the wrong formula or something? :rolleyes:
 
roam said:
I also have another relevant question:

Calculate the speed of the cannonball just before it hits A.

I used the formula v=v_i + at = 90 + (\pm 9.81)8.7

With that formula you are only finding the vertical component of the speed of the cannonball. Remember that the ball is moving in the horizontal plane aswell.

Also, make sure that you use the correct sign infront of the 9.81ms-2. If gravity is acting in favor of the direction of the object, it's accellerating it, otherwise it's decellerating it and hence must be accounted for differently.
 
Last edited:
Lunat1c said:
With that formula you are only finding the vertical component of the speed of the cannonball. Remember that the ball is moving in the horizontal plane aswell.

Also, make sure that you use the correct sign infront of the 9.81 9.81ms-2. If gravity is acting in favor of the direction of the object, it's accellerating it, otherwise it's decellerating it and hence must be accounted for differently.

So, what formula would you propose? :confused:
 
Once you find the horizontal velocity, you need to add the two together (vectorially) to get the resultant velocity which is probably what you're being asked for.
 
Lunat1c said:
Once you find the horizontal velocity, you need to add the two together (vectorially) to get the resultant velocity which is probably what you're being asked for.

I didn't know that the formula v=vi + at is only for the vertical velocity. Is there a formula that gives us the resultant velocity?

Does the formula v=xt give the horizontal velocity? If so then 553.66x8.7=1816.8, and if we add the two together we get 1816.8+4.7=1821.45. But this is very different from the correct answer (183 meters)!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K