voko Messages 6,053 Reaction score 391 Sep 8, 2013 #31 Yes they do. And because the motion is not accelerated, how does ## \frac {s_1} {t_1} ## compare with ## \frac {s_2} {t_2} ##?
Yes they do. And because the motion is not accelerated, how does ## \frac {s_1} {t_1} ## compare with ## \frac {s_2} {t_2} ##?
voko Messages 6,053 Reaction score 391 Sep 8, 2013 #33 Of course they are constant, because they are ratios of constants. But that does not answer the question at all.
Of course they are constant, because they are ratios of constants. But that does not answer the question at all.
KingPapaya Messages 21 Reaction score 0 Sep 8, 2013 #34 Oh sorry I meant that the velocities are constant, but other than that I'm not sure.
voko Messages 6,053 Reaction score 391 Sep 8, 2013 #35 Are those two velocities different? Which one is higher?
voko Messages 6,053 Reaction score 391 Sep 8, 2013 #37 Why would it be? The motion, as you said, is not accelerated.
voko Messages 6,053 Reaction score 391 Sep 8, 2013 #39 Indeed. Any part of an unaccelerated path is traversed with the same constant velocity. Now, you have total horizontal distance and total time. You also have time to the apex, and and you need to find the horizontal distance to the apex. Apply the results of the discussion to this.
Indeed. Any part of an unaccelerated path is traversed with the same constant velocity. Now, you have total horizontal distance and total time. You also have time to the apex, and and you need to find the horizontal distance to the apex. Apply the results of the discussion to this.
KingPapaya Messages 21 Reaction score 0 Sep 8, 2013 #40 So I should set up a proportion of: time it takes to reach max height/x=time of total flight/distance of whole flight
So I should set up a proportion of: time it takes to reach max height/x=time of total flight/distance of whole flight