Proof by contradiction for simple inequality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the inequality $$-1 \leq \frac{1-a}{a} \leq 1$$ under the condition that $$a \approx 1$$ using proof by contradiction. The initial assumption that $$\frac{|1-a|}{a} > 1$$ leads to a conclusion that $$a < \frac{1}{2}$$, which contradicts the premise that $$a$$ is close to 1. The participants clarify that defining $$a \approx 1$$ requires a precise epsilon definition, ensuring that values of $$a$$ must remain within a specific range around 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic inequalities in mathematics
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction techniques
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions in calculus
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus
  • Explore advanced proof techniques in mathematical analysis
  • Learn about inequalities and their applications in real analysis
  • Review examples of proof by contradiction in mathematical literature
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying analysis or algebra, educators seeking to explain proof techniques, and anyone interested in the rigor of mathematical proofs.

tomwilliam2
Messages
117
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show that if ##a \approx 1##, then
$$-1 \leq \frac{1-a}{a} \leq 1$$

I've started off trying a contradiction, i.e. suppose
$$ \frac{|1-a|}{a} > 1$$

either i)
$$\frac{1-a}{a} < -1$$
then multiply by a and add a to show
$$1 < 0$$
which is clearly false,

or ii)
$$1 < \frac{1-a}{a}$$
Which by the same reckoning leads me to
$$a < \frac{1}{2}$$

Which seems inconsistent with the original statement that ##a \approx 1##.
It's hardly a rock solid proof though, is it?
Is there a better way of doing this?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it is inconsistent! This is a proof by contradiction, remember? Your result that a< 1/2 contradicts the fact that a is close to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks HallsofIvy. So you think that is enough to prove the original statement then?
The reason I thought it was a bit wooly, was that ##a \approx 1## is unclear regarding exactly how close to 1 it is!
Also, given that my final conclusion limits ##a## to less than 1/2, I'm unclear as to why they chose 1 as the bound in the original question. They could have chosen a range of other numbers (i.e ##-0.5 < (1-a)/a < 0.5##) and normally these things work out neater.
But if you think it's a sound proof, that's all that counts.
Thanks
 
No, your conclusion is NOT that a is less than 1/2! Your conclusion is that assuming that (1- a)/a> 1 leads to "a< 1/2" which contradicts the given fact that "a\approx. 1".
 
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear:
Yes, I am concluding that assuming (1-a)/a > 1 leads to a < 1/2. But my problem is with the second point. Does that necessarily contradict the fact that ##a \approx 1##? That doesn't seem mathematically rigorous to me (although I'm only a beginner). Imagine, for example, that ##a## was a measure of the distance on a galactic scale...something like a=1/4 would be fairly close to 1, on that scale wouldn't it? Doesn't the "approximately equal to" have some more precise definition?
Thanks
 
You can make it more precise by defining "If ##a \approx 1## then X" to mean "There is an ##\epsilon > 0## such that X for all ##a## satisfying ##|a - 1| < \epsilon##."

Then ##a < 1/2## contradicts ##a \approx 1## because for any candidate ##\epsilon##, you can find a value ##a## such that ##1/2 < a < 1## for which ##|a - 1| < \epsilon## but not ##a < 1/2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks CompuChip, that tidies it up nicely.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K