Proof by induction of a problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcin w
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical assertion by induction, specifically the equality involving summations of fractions. The user defines a summation notation and then presents their induction proof, starting with a base case that they claim is true. They outline their approach to prove the assertion for k+1, detailing the steps taken to manipulate the summation expressions. Feedback is requested on whether the definitions from part 1 should have been utilized in part 2, and additional insights are provided regarding the handling of terms in the induction step. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and correctness in mathematical proofs.
marcin w
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here. Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marcin w said:
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here.
Your teacher might not appreciate that! Saying something is true is not proving that it is true.

Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
In going form n to n+1, two things happen. First, since the sum starts at n+1 in the first case and (n+1)-1 in the second, you are missing the first term. Second, since the sum ends at 2n in the first case and 2(n+1)= 2n+ 2 in the second, you will have two new terms, 2n+1 and 2n+ 2. That is,
\sum_{k= (n+1)+1}^{2(n+1)} \frac{1}{k}= \sum_{k= n+1}^{2n} \frac{1}{k}+ \frac{1}{2n+1}+ \frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}
Now, replace that sum by
\sum_{m=1}^{2n} \frac{(-1)^m+1}{m}
and do the algebra.

You might want to use the fact that
\frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}= \frac{1- 2}{2n+2}= -\frac{1}{2n+2}
 
Thanks, your answer was helpful and much appreciated.
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K