Proof by Induction: Proving Sum Equation for n ∈ N

gruba
Messages
203
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that [itex]\forall n\in \mathbb{N}[/itex]
[tex]\sum\limits_{k=1}^{n}(-1)^{k+1}{n\choose k}\frac{1}{k}=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+...+\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

Homework Equations


-Induction
-Summation
-Binomial coefficient

The Attempt at a Solution



For [itex]n=1[/itex] equality is true.

For [itex]n=m[/itex]

[itex]m-{m\choose 2}\frac{1}{2}+...+(-1)^{m+1}\frac{1}{m}=1+\frac{1}{2}+...+\frac{1}{m}[/itex]

For [itex]n=m+1[/itex]

[itex]\left(\sum\limits_{k=1}^{m}(-1)^{k+1}{m\choose k}\frac{1}{k}\right)+(-1)^{m+2}\frac{1}{m+1}=1+\frac{1}{2}+...+\frac{1}{m+1}[/itex]

If [itex]m[/itex] is even, equality is true, but not if [itex]m[/itex] is odd.
Is this correct?

Could someone explain this in detail?
 
gruba said:
1+1/2+1/3+...+1/n
Hi gruba:

You have made some mistakes.

(1) The series being added does not include (-1)k+1. That series should be 1-1/2+1/3-1/4...

(2) The series being added does not include (m over k) with each of the fractions.

Hint: For (m over k) see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi gruba:

You have made some mistakes.

(1) The series being added does not include (-1)k+1. That series should be 1-1/2+1/3-1/4...

(2) The series being added does not include (m over k) with each of the fractions.

Hint: For (m over k) see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz

Are you sure it is a mistake?
I have some solution which I don't inderstand:

[itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}(-1)^{k+1} x^k = 1-(1-x)^n\tag{1}[/itex]
[itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}(-1)^{k+1}\frac{1}{k} = \int_{0}^{1}\frac{1-(1-x)^n}{x}\,dx= \int_{0}^{1}\frac{1-x^n}{1-x}\,dx\tag{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n}\binom{n}{k}(-1)^{k+1}\frac{1}{k} = \int_{0}^{1}\left(1+x+\ldots+x^{n-1}\right)\,dx = 1+\frac{1}{2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{n}=H_n\tag{3}[/itex]
 
Hi gruba:

Your (1) is OK.
The left hand equality in your (2) is OK. I don't see how you get the right hand equality in your (2).

ADDED
Ah. You substituted x -> (1-x). You forgot to also substitute dx -> -dx.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi gruba:

Your (1) is OK.
The left hand equality in your (2) is OK. I don't see how you get the right hand equality in your (2).

ADDED
Ah. You substituted x -> (1-x)

Regards,
Buzz

This is my book's solution which I don't understand.
Is there some approach which doesn't involve integration?
 
Hi gruba:

I edited a bit more to my last post after you responded. Please take another look at my previous post.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Hi gruba:

Sorry. My mistake. The missing minus sign is corrected by reversing the top and bottom limits of the integration.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Hi gruba:

My apologies for my earlier confusion.

The derivation (1), (2) and (3) is a proof of the original equality. However it is not a proof by induction.

Going back to your original post, after
gruba said:
For n=m+1
the (m over k) in the summation should be (m+1 over k).

Regards,
Buzz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K