Proof equality of an equation with exponentials.

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Proof if A,B and C are non zero constant:
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\Rightarrow\; a=b=c[/tex]
The answer from the book involve differentiating it twice and manipulate a, b and c to proof.

My question is if I differentiate it once:
[tex]\Rightarrow\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
So if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
Does that already proof a=b=c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
Proof if A,B and C are non zero constant:
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\Rightarrow\; a=b=c[/tex]
The answer from the book involve differentiating it twice and manipulate a, b and c to proof.

My question is if I differentiate it once:
[tex]\Rightarrow\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
So if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
Does that already proof a=b=c?

It's not a proof until you say why you think that proves a=b=c.
 
Dick said:
It's not a proof until you say why you think that proves a=b=c.

Can I say if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})=jcCe^{jcx}\Rightarrow;d=c[/tex]
and if
[tex]\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})\Rightarrow\; a=b=d[/tex]

Therefore a=b=c

Thanks
Alan
 
yungman said:
Can I say if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})=jcCe^{jcx}\Rightarrow;d=c[/tex]
and if
[tex]\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})\Rightarrow\; a=b=d[/tex]

Therefore a=b=c

Thanks
Alan

I really don't know where those implications are coming from and I don't see how you got a 'd' out of an expression containing a, b and c.
 
You have written some conditional statements in the form of [itex]P \Rightarrow Q[/itex], but you haven't included any proof of whether they're true or not.

By direct proof, for instance, you have to show that P being true forces Q to be true.