Proof: Let $f$ be a Nonconstant Entire Function on the Unit Disc

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a nonconstant entire function \( f \) that maps the unit circle into itself also maps the open unit disc into itself. Participants suggest using the maximum modulus principle, which states that the maximum of the modulus of \( f \) is achieved on the boundary of the unit disc. They establish that the map \( M(r) = \sup_{|z|=r}|f(z)| \) is strictly increasing, leading to the conclusion that if \( M(1) = 1 \), then for any \( r < 1 \), \( M(r) < 1 \). This confirms that \( f \) indeed maps the open unit disc into itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of entire functions in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the maximum modulus principle
  • Knowledge of the properties of the unit circle and open unit disc
  • Basic concepts of supremum and increasing functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the maximum modulus principle in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of entire functions and their mappings
  • Learn about the relationship between boundary behavior and interior mappings in complex functions
  • Investigate examples of nonconstant entire functions and their modulus behavior
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, students studying entire functions, and anyone interested in the properties of mappings in the context of complex variables.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Let $f$ be a nonconstant entire function that maps the unit circle, $\{z: |z| = 1\}$, into itself. Prove that $f$ maps the open unit disc, $\{z: |z| < 1\}$, into itself.

I am having a little trouble starting this one. z in C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try by contradiction, using the maximum modulus principle?
 
girdav said:
Did you try by contradiction, using the maximum modulus principle?

How would that be used? An open disc doesn't have a maximum modulus.
 
Use the fact that the maximum of the modulus is reached at the boundary.
 
girdav said:
Use the fact that the maximum of the modulus is reached at the boundary.

That still doesn't make sense. Every time we get close to the boundary, we can get a little bit closer. Moreover, we can get a little bit closer and infinite amount of times.
 
In fact, we have to work with the map $M(r):=\sup_{|z|=r}|f(z)|$. We can show thanks to maximum modulus principle that this map is strictly increasing.
 
girdav said:
In fact, we have to work with the map $M(r):=\sup_{|z|=r}|f(z)|$. We can show thanks to maximum modulus principle that this map is strictly increasing.

I don't understand what you are getting at.
 
If $M(r_1)\geq M(r_2)$ for some $r_1<r_2$, the maximum modulus principle shows that $f$ is constant, so $M$ is a strcily increasing map. Now, we have that $M(1)=1$, so if $r<1$ then $M(r)<1$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K