Proof of AM-GM Inequality: Spivak's Calculus Chapter 2 Problem 22 Part A

  • Thread starter Thread starter erh5060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean (AM-GM) Inequality as presented in Spivak's Calculus, specifically Chapter 2 Problem 22 Part A. The proof begins by establishing that if \( a_1 < A_n \) and \( a_2 > A_n \), then \( a_1 a_2 < a^*_1 a^*_2 \), where \( a^*_1 = A_n \) and \( a^*_2 = a_1 + a_2 - a^*_1 \). The participants emphasize the need for a formal proof by induction to demonstrate that \( G_n \leq A_n \) and clarify that equality holds when all \( a_i \) are equal to \( A_n \.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Arithmetic Mean (AM) and Geometric Mean (GM)
  • Familiarity with proof techniques, particularly mathematical induction
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities in mathematics
  • Concept of sequences and their limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal proof of the AM-GM Inequality using mathematical induction
  • Explore the properties of sequences and their convergence
  • Investigate the implications of equality in the AM-GM Inequality
  • Review examples of inequalities in calculus and their proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians interested in inequalities, and educators seeking to enhance their understanding of proof techniques related to the AM-GM Inequality.

erh5060
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From Spivak's Calculus, Chapter 2 Problem 22 Part A:

Here, A_{n} and G_{n} stand for the arithmetic and geometric means respectively and a_{i}\geq 0 for i=1,\cdots,n.

Suppose that a_{1} &lt; A_{n}. Then some a_{i} satisfies a_{i} &gt; A_{n}; for convenience, say a_{2} &gt; A_{n}. Let a^{*}_{1} = A_{n}, and let a^{*}_{2} = a_{1} + a_{2} - a^{*}_{1}. Show that

a^{*}_{1} a^{*}_{2} \geq a_{1} a_{2}

Why does repeating this process enough times eventually prove that G_{n} \leq A_{n}? (This is another place where it is a good exercise to provide a formal proof by induction, as well as an informal reason.) When does equality hold in the formula G_{n} \leq A_{n}?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The first part of the proof was easy:

A^{2}_{n} - (a_{1} + a_{2}) A_{n} + a_{1} a_{2} = (A_{n} - a_{1})(A_{n} - a_{2}) &lt; 0 since it was given that a_{1} &lt; A_{n} &lt; a_{2}. Rearranging this leads to a_{1} a_{2} &lt; a^{*}_1 a^{*}_2, which is what the problem asked for.

It is also clear that equality holds when a_{1} = a_{2} = \cdots = a_{n} = A_{n}. The part that is baffling me is filling in the rest of the logic of this proof to show that G_{n} \leq A_{n}. I'm not exactly sure what process I'm suppose to "repeat" as stated in the problem, or how I'm supposed to turn it into a formal proof by induction. None of a^{*}_{i} for i \geq 3 were defined anywhere in the problem. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, well you basically already proved that the GM of the a_i's is less than the GM of the a^*_i's. But note that the AM of the a_i's is equal to the AM of the a^*_i's, so perhaps try to exploit this fact.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K