Proof of Cauchy-Schwarty Inequality

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter Yu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a specific step in the proof of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality as presented in "Quantum Mechanics Demystified." Participants seek clarification on mathematical expressions and notation related to the proof, which involves concepts from quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about a key step in the proof and requests assistance.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify the step by comparing it to the expansion of a squared expression, suggesting it involves taking an inner product.
  • A different participant proposes a potential correction to a notation error in the proof, suggesting an alternative expression for |f⟩.
  • Several participants discuss the use of LaTeX for formatting equations, with one participant seeking help on how to input mathematical symbols correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the understanding of the key step in the proof, and multiple viewpoints regarding the notation and formatting of equations are presented.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the specific mathematical steps involved in the proof and the correct usage of LaTeX for formatting equations.

Peter Yu
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Proof of Cauchy-Schwarty Inequality from the Book "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" Page 133.
I do not understand one key step! Most appreciated someone could help.
Please see attached file.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Peter,

That step is kind of like taking the inner product of f with f. To put it into perspective, if we take an expression (a+b) squared, we would get a^2 + 2ab + b^2. Same concept here from what I see.

elite
 
Hi Elite,
Many thank! I still cannot understand.
Perhaps this can help:
If : | f > = |a > - < b | a> ( | b >)
Then: < f | = ??
 
Peter Yu said:
Proof of Cauchy-Schwarty Inequality from the Book "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" Page 133.
I do not understand one key step! Most appreciated someone could help.
Please see attached file.

It looks like a typo. I think the author meant to write:
|f\rangle = |\phi\rangle - \dfrac{\langle \psi|\phi\rangle}{\langle \psi|\psi \rangle} |\psi\rangle
 
Hi Steven,
Thank you. You are smart! I think you are right!
By the way, how do you input your equation in the above message? I cannot input the equation using the key board.
 
Peter Yu said:
Hi Steven,
Thank you. You are smart! I think you are right!
By the way, how do you input your equation in the above message? I cannot input the equation using the key board.

You have to write it using LaTex, which uses syntax like

\psi^*

for \psi^*

Alternatively, you can write most things using the symbols provided at the top of the edit window (click on Σ).
 
Hi Steven,
I do not know the Latex code.
Can you write a fraction (in your equation) by using the edit window bar? And how can use the X squared icon in the edit window bar?
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K