Proof of Cauchy's Inequality .... Sohrab Proposition 2.1.23

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Proposition 2.1.23 from Houshang H. Sohrab's "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition), specifically Exercise 2.1.24, which requires proving the proposition. The key equation derived is F(t) = ∑(x_i - t y_i)² ≥ 0, leading to the formulation of the discriminant D = 4Z² - 4XY, where X = ∑x_i², Y = ∑y_i², and Z = ∑x_i y_i. The conclusion drawn is that for the quadratic to be non-negative for all real x, the discriminant must be less than or equal to zero, confirming the properties of the roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly sequences and series.
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions and their discriminants.
  • Knowledge of summation notation and basic properties of real numbers.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic functions and their discriminants in detail.
  • Review the proofs of Cauchy's inequality and its applications in real analysis.
  • Explore advanced topics in sequences and series, focusing on convergence and divergence.
  • Practice solving similar exercises from "Basic Real Analysis" to reinforce understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of inequalities and quadratic functions in the context of real number sequences and series.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement



I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 2: Sequences and Series of Real Numbers ... ...

I need help with Proposition 2.1.23/Exercise 2.1.24 (Exercise 2.1.24 asks readers to prove Proposition 2.1.23)

Proposition 2.1.23/Exercise 2.1.24 reads as follows:

?temp_hash=4a50669fed0bf5cd884e74242a2c91d0.png


In the above text by Sohrab, we read the following:

" ... ... Observe that for any ##t \in \mathbb{R}, F(t) = \sum_{ i = 1 }^n ( x_i - t y_i )^2 \ge 0## and look at the discriminant ##Z^2 - XY## of ##F(t)##. ... ... "Can someone please explain how one proceeds after determining the discriminant and what principles/properties of the discriminant are used ...

Homework Equations



The relevant information is given in the problem statement ... basic properties of the real numbers are assumed ...

The Attempt at a Solution



my working so far on the exercise is as follows:

##F(t) = \sum_{ i = 1 }^n ( x_i - t y_i )^2 \ge 0##

Now ... ... ##\sum_{ i = 1 }^n ( x_i - t y_i )^2 \ge 0##

##\Longleftrightarrow \sum_{ i = 1 }^n ( x_i^2 - 2t x_i y_i + t^2 y_i^2) \ge 0##

##\Longleftrightarrow \sum_{ i = 1 }^n x_i^2 - 2 t \sum_{ i = 1 }^n x_i y_i + t^2 \sum_{ i = 1 }^n y_i^2 \ge 0## ... ... ... (1)... now let ##X = \sum_{ i = 1 }^n x_i^2##, ## \ ## ##Y = \sum_{ i = 1 }^n y_i^2 \ ## and ## \ Z = \sum_{ i = 1 }^n x_i y_i##Then (1) becomes ##X - 2t Z + Y t^2 \ge 0##

and the discriminant, ##D = 4Z^2 - 4XY##BUT ... how do we proceed from here .. ... and exactly what properties of the discriminant do we use ...Help will be appreciated,

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Sohrab - Cauchy's Inequality - Proposition 2.1.23 and Exercise 2.1.24 ....png
    Sohrab - Cauchy's Inequality - Proposition 2.1.23 and Exercise 2.1.24 ....png
    30.6 KB · Views: 530
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If ax^2 + bx + c \geq 0 for all x \in \mathbb{R}, then its roots are either both zero or a complex conjugate pair.
 
pasmith said:
If ax^2 + bx + c \geq 0 for all x \in \mathbb{R}, then its roots are either both zero or a complex conjugate pair.

Thanks pasmith ... BUT ... I am not sure how to use that fact ...

PeterEDIT

On further reflection, then the discriminant is less than or equal to zero ... so the result follows ...

I think that that is correct ...

Thanks ...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K