Proof of Contraction Mapping for $f\left(x\right)={e}^{{-e}^{-x}}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ozkan12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contraction Mapping
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on proving that the function $f(x) = e^{-e^{-x}}$ is a contraction mapping on the real numbers. Participants explore various approaches to demonstrate this property, particularly through the analysis of the derivative and the application of the mean value theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a proof that $f(x) = e^{-e^{-x}}$ is a contraction mapping.
  • Another suggests proving that $|f'(x)| < 1$ as a method to establish the contraction property.
  • A participant shares their derivative calculation, $f'(x) = e^{-(x + e^{-x})}$, and questions how to show that this expression is less than or equal to 1.
  • Discussion arises about the conditions under which $-(x + e^{-x}) \le 0$ holds true.
  • One participant proposes proving that $x + e^{-x} > 0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ to conclude that $e^{-(x + e^{-x})} < 1$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.
  • Another participant discusses the use of the supremum of $|f'(x)|$ to establish a contraction constant of $1/e$.
  • Several participants inquire about the rationale behind using the supremum and the minimum value of the function $g(x) = x + e^{-x}$ in the proof.
  • One participant notes that the maximum of $f'(x)$ occurs where $g(x)$ has a minimum, linking the behavior of the derivative to the properties of the function $g(x)$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the methods to prove the contraction mapping property, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Some agree on the necessity of analyzing the derivative, while others question specific steps and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of using different metrics for contraction mappings and the significance of critical points in the analysis of the function's behavior.

ozkan12
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
Please can you prove that $f\left(x\right)={e}^{{-e}^{-x}}$ is contraction mapping on R...Thank you for your attention...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try proving that $|f'(x)|<1$.
 
I tried this but I didnt get something...Dear professor
 
What did you get for $f'(x)$?
 
I get this ${e}^{-(x+{e}^{-x})}$...But how ${e}^{-(x+{e}^{-x})}$ $\le$ 1 ?
 
Well, based on our knowledge of the exponential function $e^x$, we know that $e^x \le 1$ precisely when $x\le 0$. Can you prove that $-(x+e^{-x})\le 0?$

Also, with contraction mappings, it's always a good idea to mention which metric is being used. Is it just $d(x,y)=|x-y|?$

Actually, a more fruitful method of showing this might be to let $g(x)=f'(x)$, and maximize $g(x)$ using the usual calculus methods.
 
I know $-\left(x+{e}^{-x}\right)$ $\le$0...But for which "x" we get ${e}^{-(x+{e}^{-x})}$ $\le$ 1? $x\in[0,\infty)$ or $x\in[-\infty,0)$...I didnt know this
 
Hi ozkan12,

You want to prove $x + e^{-x} > 0$ for all $x\in \Bbb R$, for then $e^{-(x + e^{-x})} < 1$ for all $x\in \Bbb R$ as desired. Actually, we can prove that $1/e$ is a suitable contraction constant for $f$ by showing that $1/e = \sup\limits_{-\infty < x < \infty} |f'(x)|$. Now the function $g(x) = x + e^{-x}$ has only one critical point at $x = 0$. Furthermore, $g'(x) = 1 - e^{-x}$ is positive for all $x > 0$ and negative for all $x < 0$. By the first derivative test, $g$ has a global minimum at $x = 0$. The minimum value of $g$ is $g(0) = 1$, so

$$\sup_{-\infty < x < \infty} |f'(x)| = e^{-g(0)} = e^{-1},$$

proving that $1/e$ is a contraction constant for $f$.
 
Dear professor,

Why we use supremum ?
 
  • #10
We use the mean value theorem to relate derivative and contraction. Namely, if $f$ is differentiable on an interval $I$, then for every $x_1,x_2\in I$ there exists an $x_0\in (x_1,x_2)\subseteq I$ such that $f(x_2)-f(x_1)=(x_2-x_1)f'(x_0)$. Thus, if $S=\sup_{x\in I}|f'(x)|$, then $|f(x_0)|\le S$ and
\[
|f(x_2)-f(x_1)|=|x_2-x_1|\cdot|f(x_0)|\le |x_2-x_1|\cdot S.
\]
Therefore, if $S<1$. then $f$ is a contraction on $I$.
 
  • #11
Dear professor,

Why we use minimum value of "g" ?
 
  • #12
ozkan12 said:
Dear professor,

Why we use minimum value of "g" ?

So, from Euge's post, we have $g(x)=x+e^{-x}$. Then the original function's derivative is $f'(x)=e^{-g(x)}$. Now $e^{-x}$ is a monotonically decreasing function. It follows that a maximum of $f'(x)$, which is what we are trying to find, would happen precisely where $g(x)$ has a minimum.
 
  • #13
Dear Ackbach

I opened new thread on forum...Can you see that ? Thank you for your attention :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K