Proof of Divergence: (-1)^n Sequence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence $$(-1)^n$$ diverges as proven using the ε-definition of the limit of a sequence. A sequence of real numbers $$x_n$$ converges in $$R$$ if there exists a limit $$m$$ such that for every ε>0, there exists a natural number $$k$$ satisfying $$|x_n - m| < ε$$ for all $$n \geq k$$. The divergence of the sequence can be established by negating this definition, demonstrating that for any proposed limit $$L$$, the condition $$|(-1)^n - L| \geq ε$$ holds true for infinitely many terms of the sequence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ε-definition of limits in real analysis
  • Familiarity with sequences and their convergence properties
  • Basic knowledge of propositional logic
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and formalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ε-definition of limits in greater detail
  • Explore examples of convergent and divergent sequences
  • Learn about the implications of divergence in real analysis
  • Investigate the application of propositional logic in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the concepts of sequence convergence and divergence in real analysis.

solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
Prove that the sequence :$$(-1)^n$$ diverges by using the ε-definition of the limit of a sequence
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, what is that definition? Can you give an explicit statement of the definition?
 
Re: Sequences

HallsofIvy said:
Ok, what is that definition? Can you give an explicit statement of the definition?

Yes.
[sp] A sequence of real Nos, $$x_n$$, converges in $$R $$ iff

There exists $$m\in R$$ such that ,$$\forall\epsilon>0$$,there exists a natural No $$ k$$,such that :

$$\forall n\geq k\Longrightarrow |x_n-m|<\epsilon$$

.......OR in complete formalization.......

A sequence of real Nos, $$x_n$$, converges in $$R $$ iff

$$\exists m\forall\epsilon[\epsilon>0\Longrightarrow\exists k(k\in N\wedge\forall n(n\geq k\Longrightarrow |x_n-m|<\epsilon))]$$

Hence for diversion one ​may use the negation of the above definition[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Re: Sequences

Very good!

So, use a proof by contradiction. If this sequence converges to, say, m, then, given any $\epsilon> 0$, there exist N such that, if n> N, $|a_n- m|< \epsilon$. Suppose $\epsilon$ were equal to, say, 1/2. Since for any odd n, $a_n= -1$, and for any even n, $a_n= 1$, no matter what N is there will exist some even number, $n_e$, and some odd number, $n_o$, both larger than N such that $|a_{n_e}- m|= |1- m|< 1/2$ and $|a_{n_0}- m|= |-1- m|< 1/2$.

The first of those says $-1/2< 1- m< 1/2$ so that $-3/2< m< -1/2$ and the second that $-1/2< -1- m< 1/2$ so that $-3/2< -m< -1/2$ and then $1/2< m< 3/2$. $-3/2< m< -1/2$ and $1/2< m< 3/2$ cannot both be true.

Is there any reason why this pretty standard "Calculus I" homework problem was posted in "Challenge Questions and Puzzles"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Sequences

Here is my solution.

Given a real number $L$, set $\epsilon = \max\{\lvert 1 - \lvert L\rvert\rvert,2\}$. Then $\epsilon > 0$. If $N$ is a positive integer, let $n$ be $2N+1$ if $L \neq -1$, and $2N$ if $L=-1$. Then $n > N$ and $\lvert (-1)^n - L\rvert \ge \epsilon$. Hence, the sequence $\{(-1)^n\}$ is divergent.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sequences

HallsofIvy said:
Very good!

So, use a proof by contradiction. If this sequence converges to, say, m, then, given any $\epsilon> 0$, there exist N such that, if n> N, $|a_n- m|< \epsilon$. Suppose $\epsilon$ were equal to, say, 1/2. Since for any odd n, $a_n= -1$, and for any even n, $a_n= 1$, no matter what N is there will exist some even number, $n_e$, and some odd number, $n_o$, both larger than N such that $|a_{n_e}- m|= |1- m|< 1/2$ and $|a_{n_0}- m|= |-1- m|< 1/2$.

The first of those says $-1/2< 1- m< 1/2$ so that $-3/2< m< -1/2$ and the second that $-1/2< -1- m< 1/2$ so that $-3/2< -m< -1/2$ and then $1/2< m< 3/2$. $-3/2< m< -1/2$ and $1/2< m< 3/2$ cannot both be true.

Is there any reason why this pretty standard "Calculus I" homework problem was posted in "Challenge Questions and Puzzles"?
[sp] if n>N,then is either even or odd and not both
For example if N =100 ,all the n>N are:
101 or 102 or 103 or 104 or 105 or 106 e.t.c,e.t.c

And not ,101 and,102 ,e.t.c,e.t.c , because n can take only one value

For n even we have :|1-m|<1/2 => 1/2<m<3/2 or

For n odd we have :|1+m|<1/2 => -3/2<m<-1/2

Hence if n>N => n is even or odd => (1/2<m<3/2)or (-3/2<m<-1/2) which is true

From propositional logic:

(pv q ,p=>r,q=>t) => r v t.............1

put:

p=n is even
q= n is odd
r= 1/2<m<3/2
t= -3/2<m<-1/2

Then by using the above law we end up with : (1/2<m<3/2) or (-3/2<m<-1/2) [/sp]
 
Re: Sequences

Euge said:
Here is my solution.

Given a real number $L$, set $\epsilon = \max\{\lvert 1 - \lvert L\rvert\rvert,2\}$. Then $\epsilon > 0$. If $N$ is a positive integer, let $n$ be $2N+1$ if $L \neq -1$, and $2N$ if $L=-1$. Then $n > N$ and $\lvert (-1)^n - L\rvert \ge \epsilon$. Hence, the sequence $\{(-1)^n\}$ is divergent.

[sp] For n=2N+1, $$L\neq -1$$ ,then n>N and $$|(-1)^n-L|=|-1-L|=|1+L|$$

So ε must be set :ε =min{|1+L|,2}

I think.[/sp]
 
Re: Sequences

solakis said:
[sp] For n=2N+1, $$L\neq -1$$ ,then n>N and $$|(-1)^n-L|=|-1-L|=|1+L|$$

So ε must be set :ε =min{|1+L|,2}

I think.[/sp]
There was a typo, but $\min\{\lvert 1 + L\rvert, 2\}$ is not a valid choice for $\epsilon$ since then $\epsilon = 0$ when $L = -1$. In any case, I meant to have $\epsilon = \epsilon(L) := \lvert 1 + L\rvert$ for $L \neq -1$ and $2$ for $L = -1$. It is then clear that for each positive integer $n$, $\lvert (-1)^{2n} - (-1)\rvert = 2 = \epsilon(-1)$ and $\lvert (-1)^{2n+1} - L\rvert = \lvert 1 + L\rvert = \epsilon(L)$ (when $L \neq -1$)
 
Re: Sequences

Euge said:
There was a typo, but $\min\{\lvert 1 + L\rvert, 2\}$ is not a valid choice for $\epsilon$ since then $\epsilon = 0$ when $L = -1$. In any case, I meant to have $\epsilon = \epsilon(L) := \lvert 1 + L\rvert$ for $L \neq -1$ and $2$ for $L = -1$. It is then clear that for each positive integer $n$, $\lvert (-1)^{2n} - (-1)\rvert = 2 = \epsilon(-1)$ and $\lvert (-1)^{2n+1} - L\rvert = \lvert 1 + L\rvert = \epsilon(L)$ (when $L \neq -1$)

[sp] Given L,choose ε=min{|1-L|,2},then for any natular No L,put n=2N for L=-1 and n=2N+2 for $$L\neq -1$$.

Then we have for the 1st case n>N and $$|(-1)^n-L|=|1-(-1)|=2\geq\epsilon$$ and thus $$|(-1)^n-L|\geq\epsilon$$
For the 2nd case n>N and $$|(-1)^n-L| =|1-L|\geq\epsilon$$ thus $$|(-1)^n-L|\geq\epsilon$$

On the other hand if we choose ε=2 or ε=|1+L| ,since we also have L=-1 or $$L\neq -1$$ we have to examine 4 cases as dictated by propositional logic.

(pvq)and (rvt)=> (p and r)v(p and t)v (q and r) v (q and t),where:

p= (ε=2)
q= (ε= |1+L|)

r=(L=-1)

t= ($$L\neq -1$$) [/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K