Proof of Existence & Uniqueness of Rational Number y for xy = 2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nicnicman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Uniqueness
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence and uniqueness of a rational number y such that xy = 2, given a nonzero rational number x. The proof establishes that y = 2/x is a valid solution, demonstrating existence. For uniqueness, it shows that if another rational number s satisfies xs = 2, then y must equal s, confirming uniqueness. The proof can be refined by using implication notation and emphasizing the restriction that x cannot be zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly for existence and uniqueness
  • Concept of multiplicative inverses in fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational numbers in field theory
  • Learn about proof techniques for existence and uniqueness in mathematics
  • Explore implications in mathematical proofs and their notation
  • Investigate the role of multiplicative inverses in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students interested in number theory, particularly those focusing on rational numbers and proof strategies in algebra.

nicnicman
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
To get the following proof I followed another similar example, but I'm not sure if it's correct. Does this proof properly show existence and uniqueness?

Show that if x is a nonzero rational number, then there is a unique rational number y such that xy = 2

Solution:
Existence: The nonzero rational number y = 2/x is a solution of xy = 2 because x(2/x) = 2 = x(2/x) - 2 = x - x = 0.

Uniqueness: Suppose s is a nonzero rational number such that xs = 2. Then, xy =2 = xy - 2 = 0 and xs = 2 = xs - 2 = 0. Then:

xy - 2 = xs - 2
xy = xs
y = s

This would be a complete proof wouldn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be cleaner.

First of all, use -> instead of = (for implication) since
xy = 2 = xy - 2=0 is a contradiction. Whereas xy = 2 -> xy-2=0 works.

Second, for the first part. It is sufficient to say xy=2. That is, let y=2/x, then xy=(x)(2/x)=2. You must make the restriction x =/= 0.

Third, Try to prove the uniqueness part of the proof more cleanly. Think about what you've done versus xs=2 and what xy is.
 
nicnicman said:
To get the following proof I followed another similar example, but I'm not sure if it's correct. Does this proof properly show existence and uniqueness?

Show that if x is a nonzero rational number, then there is a unique rational number y such that xy = 2

Solution:
Existence: The nonzero rational number y = 2/x is a solution of xy = 2 because x(2/x) = 2 = x(2/x) - 2 = x - x = 0.

Uniqueness: Suppose s is a nonzero rational number such that xs = 2. Then, xy =2 = xy - 2 = 0 and xs = 2 = xs - 2 = 0. Then:

xy - 2 = xs - 2
xy = xs
y = s

This would be a complete proof wouldn't it?

If you're allowed to use the field properties of the rationals, you can then also show that

multiplicative inverses are unique , so that :

xy=2 -> x-1xy=x-12 , so that y=2x-1 (by

commutativity).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K