I had to Google as well, as far as I http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~cfs/472_html/Logic_KR/proplogic_proofs472.html , using truth tables would be the semantic proof.
Semantical proof without using true tables ,i have one in mind but i am not very positive about it.Then syntactically how about a contradiction you think it could work ,although it looks a bit messy
It is not quite clear to me what you mean by a semantical proof, and a syntactical one.
Also, if you would post your idea we can have a look at it. Maybe you are on the right track but just need a last push, or maybe you even got it right but lack the confidence