- #1
O.J.
- 199
- 0
My textbook provides a proof but there's one thing about the proof i do not understand
it starts assuming L{f(t)} = the laplace integral with the f(t) changed to f(a)
same goes with L{g(t)} as it changes it to g(b)
i understand the big picture>>starting from a product of 2 L transforms and working ur way back to an expression in terms of the two functions transformed, but how can u change the variable for f and g when we started off stating f of T and g of T.?
it starts assuming L{f(t)} = the laplace integral with the f(t) changed to f(a)
same goes with L{g(t)} as it changes it to g(b)
i understand the big picture>>starting from a product of 2 L transforms and working ur way back to an expression in terms of the two functions transformed, but how can u change the variable for f and g when we started off stating f of T and g of T.?