Proof of the preservation of normalizability of the wavefunction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmad Kishki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Wavefunction
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the preservation of the normalizability of the wavefunction in quantum mechanics, specifically referencing Griffiths' textbook. It addresses the mathematical factorization in Equation 1.25 and questions whether it stems from a deeper theoretical basis. Additionally, the assumption in Equation 1.27 that the wavefunction approaches zero at infinity is critiqued as potentially leading to a fabricated normalization. The response clarifies that the normalization is maintained over time due to the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian and the Schrödinger equation, ensuring that if the wavefunction is normalized at time t=0, it remains normalized for all subsequent times. This conservation of norm reflects the fundamental principle that the total probability of finding a particle in the universe is always one.
Ahmad Kishki
Messages
158
Reaction score
13
p. 12 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths
Equation 1.25: the differential operatot was factored. This to me seems like a mathematical trick or due to amazing foresight, but is there any underlying/guiding theory for this factorisation?
Equation 1.27: the wavefunction was assumed to be zero at infinity which to me seems a bit weird, since by this assumption we enforced normalizability and got the answer we fabricated, so is my criticism valid? Is there a more rigorous proof?

The image of the book is enclosed below.

Thanks :)

<a href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>

(I don't know why the image thumbnail isn't working)
[PLAIN]http://<a [/PLAIN] href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' [/PLAIN] title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>[/PLAIN]
[PLAIN]http://<a [/PLAIN] href='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM' [/PLAIN] title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/WSUwLhM.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a>[/PLAIN]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not exactly sure what your question is. We assume that initially,

\int |\psi|^2 dx = 1

So we assume that it starts off normalized, and that \psi \rightarrow 0 as x \rightarrow \pm \infty

Then we prove, based on the assumption that it is true at time t=0, that it will be true for all time.
 
The question is, how to prove that the wave function is normalized to 1 for all times, if it was normalized to 1 at the initial time ##t=0##.

The answer is: That follows from the Schrödinger equation and the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian. Working in position representation ("wave mechanics") it reads
$$\mathrm{i} \partial_t \psi(t,\vec{x})=\hat{H} \psi(t,\vec{x}).$$
Here and in the following I use "natural units", where ##\hbar=1##.

The self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian means that for all square-integrable wave functions
$$\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi_1(\vec{x})^* \hat{H} \psi_2(\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} [\hat{H} \psi_1(\vec{x})]^* \psi_2(\vec{x}).$$
Now you can prove that the norm of the wave function is conserved under the time evolution following from the Schrödinger equation:
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \left [\partial_t \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) + \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \partial_t \psi(t,\vec{x}) \right ].$$
Now from the Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate this gives
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \psi(t,\vec{x}) = \mathrm{i} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \left [(\hat{H} \psi)^* \psi-\psi^* \hat{H} \psi \right ]=0.$$
Thus the norm is preserved under time evolution and thus, if the wave function is normalized to 1 at any time it stays so. This must be so from the physical point of view, because the probality to find the particle somewhere in the whole universe is always 1 (because in non-relativistic physics particles usually are not destroyed in interactions in contrast to relativistic physics, where the creation and annihilation of particle-antiparticle pairs and similar processes are the usual business :-)).
 
  • Like
Likes Ahmad Kishki
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K