- #1

- 4

- 0

@f/ @x = lim h-->0 lim [f(a +h, b) - f(a, b)] / h

If possible , i'd like to seen all the calculations

Best regards

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Jonnyquest
- Start date

- #1

- 4

- 0

@f/ @x = lim h-->0 lim [f(a +h, b) - f(a, b)] / h

If possible , i'd like to seen all the calculations

Best regards

- #2

CompuChip

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 4,302

- 47

- #3

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,851

- 413

You don't prove a definition.

- #4

- 3,609

- 1,396

erm unless u mean the easy derivation where u start by [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=lim_{x->a}\frac{f(x,b)-f(a,b)}{x-a}[/tex]

you can use the function [tex]g(h)=a+h[/tex]

and replace x=g(h) since [tex](lim_{x->a}x)=a=(lim_{h->0}g(h))[/tex].

you can use the function [tex]g(h)=a+h[/tex]

and replace x=g(h) since [tex](lim_{x->a}x)=a=(lim_{h->0}g(h))[/tex].

Last edited:

- #5

CompuChip

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 4,302

- 47

Hello, i'm trying to proof the partial derivative definition

Ah, I missed that you are trying to prove the definition itself.

Well, that is very easy: by definition, it is true.

- #6

- 4

- 0

But i don't how to doi it.

I already proof the simple derivative definition.

Thanks

- #7

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,851

- 413

It can't be done, at least not without more information about what's considered "right".It was my Math teacher who challenged me to proof that the definition is right.

But i don't how to doi it.

Note that you

- #8

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 963

- #9

CompuChip

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 4,302

- 47

Or that is satisfies a product rule.

Or both.

Or something else entirely.

It's just guessing here what your teacher meant, so maybe you should ask him to clarify :)

- #10

- 4

- 0

Now i've to proof that a function x^2 + y^2 is equal to 2x in order to x and by the definition ( limit ).

How do i do it ??

Thanks

Best Regards

- #11

Fredrik

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 10,851

- 413

Do you know the definition of the derivative? Do you know the definition of a limit of a function? Show us your attempt to use these definitions, and we'll try to help.

I assume that what you're asking is either

"prove that if f(x)=x^{2}+y^{2}, then f'(x)=2x"

or

"prove that if "f(x,y)=x^{2}+y^{2}, then f_{,1}(x,y)=2x".

(The ",1" notation is what I use for the derivative of f with respect to the first variable). The solutions to these problems will look almost exactly the same.

I assume that what you're asking is either

"prove that if f(x)=x

or

"prove that if "f(x,y)=x

(The ",1" notation is what I use for the derivative of f with respect to the first variable). The solutions to these problems will look almost exactly the same.

Last edited:

- #12

- 3,609

- 1,396

[tex]\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial x}=lim_{h->0}\frac{(x+h)^2+y^2-(x^2+y^2}{h}=lim_{h->0}\frac{(x+h)^2-x^2}{h}=lim_{h->0}\frac{(x+h+x)(x+h-x)}{h}=[/tex]

[tex]=lim_{h->0}\frac{(2x+h)h}{h}=lim_{h->0}(2x+h)=2x.[/tex]

Now fredric is gonna be angry like his avatar image if he sees i gave u the full solution so get it fast :)...But i have to say maybe i did more harm to you than help by giving you the full solution.

- #13

- 4

- 0

I made a small mistake , when i did the indetermination 0/0. But when i saw the solution posted by Delta , i saw the error.

Thanks to you all.

Share: