Proof that sinc function is not elementary?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hey, does anyone know of a proof that the sinc function

[tex]Si(x) = \int \frac{\sin x}{x} \, dx[/tex]

is not elementary? Or is it not proven?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it just me or is the wikipedia page lacking? Under the examples, it doesn't show how Risch's algorithm is used, or what it even is.
 
Citan Uzuki said:
A full proof can be found in this paper.

It's hard. Requires a plow. And I think he should have said, "as elementary as the subject matter allows" which is not too elementary but that is life. Still though, would be nice if someone could make it simpler and easier to understand for Calculus students because the subject comes up often. Say a description that could be included in a first-year Calculus book that is likely to be understood intuitively by the student, like one whole chapter devoted to the matter.