Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Proof that sinc function is not elementary?

  1. Dec 7, 2013 #1
    Hey, does anyone know of a proof that the sinc function

    [tex] Si(x) = \int \frac{\sin x}{x} \, dx [/tex]

    is not elementary? Or is it not proven?

  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 7, 2013 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    See Risch algorithm. I don't know if there is a simpler way, but it wouldn't be unproved.

    Edit: I'll just point out that "sinc", i.e. the cardinal sine, is ##\frac{\sin x}{x}## is elementary. Its antiderivative is called the sine integral.
  4. Dec 7, 2013 #3
    Is it just me or is the wikipedia page lacking? Under the examples, it doesn't show how Risch's algorithm is used, or what it even is.
  5. Dec 7, 2013 #4
  6. Dec 9, 2013 #5
    It's hard. Requires a plow. And I think he should have said, "as elementary as the subject matter allows" which is not too elementary but that is life. Still though, would be nice if someone could make it simpler and easier to understand for Calculus students because the subject comes up often. Say a description that could be included in a first-year Calculus book that is likely to be understood intuitively by the student, like one whole chapter devoted to the matter.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Proof sinc function Date
B Proof of a limit rule Dec 19, 2017
B Proof of quotient rule using Leibniz differentials Jun 10, 2017
B Don't follow one small step in proof Jun 10, 2017
Projection of a Jinc is a Sinc Apr 5, 2015