Proof that the rationals are not a G_\delta set.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Set
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 8K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I understand that showing [itex]\mathbb Q[/itex] is not a [itex]G_\delta[/itex] set is quite a non-trivial exercise, involving (among other things) an invocation of the Baire category theorem. Do any of you guys know it, or know where I can find it online? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I encountered this when I had to show that there does not exist a function from R to R that is continuous on the rationals and discontinuous on the irrationals.

You could start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gδ_set#Examples".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
snipez90 said:
I think I encountered this when I had to show that there does not exist a function from R to R that is continuous on the rationals and discontinuous on the irrationals.

You could start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gδ_set#Examples".

Thanks. I actually *did* start there, but was a little mystified by the following statement:

"If we were able to write [itex]\mathbb Q = \bigcap_1^\infty \mathcal O_n[/itex] for open sets [itex]\mathcal O_n[/itex], each [itex]\mathcal O_n[/itex] would have to be dense in [itex]\mathbb R[/itex] since [itex]\mathbb Q[/itex] is dense in [itex]\mathbb R[/itex]."

Why is this so? What, or who, says that if you write a dense set as an intersection of open sets, each of the sets in the intersection has to be dense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any set containing a dense set is itself dense: Since [tex]\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_n \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/tex], we have [tex]\mathbb{R} = \bar{\mathbb{Q}} \subseteq \bar{\mathcal{O}}_n \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/tex].
 
adriank said:
Any set containing a dense set is itself dense: Since [tex]\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_n \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/tex], we have [tex]\mathbb{R} = \bar{\mathbb{Q}} \subseteq \bar{\mathcal{O}}_n \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/tex].
Of course! I don't know why I didn't realize that! I guess my mind was inexplicably converting the [itex]\cap[/itex] into a [itex]\cup[/itex]. The proof on Wikipedia makes sense to me now. (The provision of the Baire category theorem that is violated, BTW, is that if [itex]\{ \mathcal O_n \}_1^\infty[/itex] is a collection of dense open sets, then so is [itex]\bigcap_1^\infty \mathcal O_n[/itex].)
 
Minor pedantry: the BCT says that a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense; not necessarily open.