Proof - Trace-preserving quantum operations are contractive

Emil_M
Messages
45
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let [itex]\mathcal{E}[/itex] be a trace-preserving quantum operation. Let [itex]\rho[/itex] and [itex]\sigma[/itex]
be density operators. Show that [itex] D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma)) \leq D(\rho,\sigma)[/itex]

Homework Equations


[itex]D(\rho, \sigma) := \frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert[/itex]
We can write [itex]\rho-\sigma=Q-S[/itex] where [itex]Q[/itex] and [itex]S[/itex] are positive matrices with orthogonal support. We choose a projector [itex]P[/itex], such that [itex] D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma))=Tr(P(\mathcal{E}(\rho)-\mathcal{E}(\sigma)))[/itex]
[itex][/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex] \begin{align*}<br /> D(\rho, \sigma) &=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert \\<br /> &=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert Q-S\rvert \\<br /> &=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(Q)+Tr(S))\\<br /> &=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q)+\mathcal{E}(S))\\<br /> &=Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q))\;\; \Big(\text{since } Tr(Q)=Tr(S) \Big) \\<br /> &\geq Tr(P\mathcal{E}(Q))<br /> \end{align*}[/itex]

Why is the last step valid? Why can a projector never increase the trace?

Thanks for you help!
 
on Phys.org
Let's say we have an operator [itex]\hat{H}[/itex] with eigenbasis [itex]\{|i \rangle\}[/itex]. Then we can conveniently express both the trace and the projector in terms of this eigenbasis: [tex]\mathrm{Tr}[\hat{O}] = \sum_{i} \langle i | \hat{O} | i \rangle \qquad \qquad \hat{P} = \sum_{i,j} a_{i}a_{j}^{*} |i\rangle \langle j| \quad \mathrm{where } \sum_{i} |a_{i}|^{2} = 1[/tex]
Inserting these expressions into [itex]\mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}][/itex] and using the fact that [itex]\hat{H}[/itex] is diagonal in this basis should enable you to prove that [tex]\mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}] \leq \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{H}][/tex]
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K