Proof - Trace-preserving quantum operations are contractive

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that trace-preserving quantum operations, denoted as \(\mathcal{E}\), are contractive with respect to the trace distance \(D(\rho, \sigma)\) between density operators \(\rho\) and \(\sigma\). The key equation used is \(D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma)) \leq D(\rho, \sigma)\), which is derived through the properties of positive matrices and projectors. The final step of the proof demonstrates that the trace of a projector applied to an operator does not exceed the trace of the operator itself, reinforcing the contractive nature of the operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum operations and density operators
  • Familiarity with trace distance and its mathematical formulation
  • Knowledge of positive matrices and projectors in quantum mechanics
  • Basic linear algebra, particularly regarding eigenvalues and eigenvectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of trace-preserving maps in quantum information theory
  • Learn about the implications of contractive operations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of projectors in quantum state measurements
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of trace distance and its applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for quantum physicists, researchers in quantum information theory, and students studying quantum mechanics who are interested in the mathematical properties of quantum operations and their implications for quantum state transformations.

Emil_M
Messages
45
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let \mathcal{E} be a trace-preserving quantum operation. Let \rho and \sigma
be density operators. Show that <br /> D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma)) \leq D(\rho,\sigma)<br />

Homework Equations


D(\rho, \sigma) := \frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert
We can write \rho-\sigma=Q-S where Q and S are positive matrices with orthogonal support. We choose a projector P, such that <br /> D(\mathcal{E}(\rho), \mathcal{E}(\sigma))=Tr(P(\mathcal{E}(\rho)-\mathcal{E}(\sigma)))<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> D(\rho, \sigma) &amp;=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert \rho-\sigma\rvert \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2} Tr \lvert Q-S\rvert \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(Q)+Tr(S))\\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{2}(Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q)+\mathcal{E}(S))\\<br /> &amp;=Tr(\mathcal{E}(Q))\;\; \Big(\text{since } Tr(Q)=Tr(S) \Big) \\<br /> &amp;\geq Tr(P\mathcal{E}(Q))<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Why is the last step valid? Why can a projector never increase the trace?

Thanks for you help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say we have an operator \hat{H} with eigenbasis \{|i \rangle\}. Then we can conveniently express both the trace and the projector in terms of this eigenbasis: \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{O}] = \sum_{i} \langle i | \hat{O} | i \rangle \qquad \qquad \hat{P} = \sum_{i,j} a_{i}a_{j}^{*} |i\rangle \langle j| \quad \mathrm{where } \sum_{i} |a_{i}|^{2} = 1
Inserting these expressions into \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}] and using the fact that \hat{H} is diagonal in this basis should enable you to prove that \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{P} \hat{H}] \leq \mathrm{Tr}[\hat{H}]
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K