Proof: Twin Primes Always Result in Perfect Squares

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof concerning twin primes and their relationship to perfect squares. The original poster presents a mathematical statement asserting that adding one to the product of twin primes results in a perfect square.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of the proof and question the necessity of restricting the argument to twin primes. Some suggest that the proof may apply to any two integers differing by two.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes stylistic suggestions for presenting the proof more accurately. There is an ongoing examination of the implications of the proof's structure and the definitions involved, with no clear consensus reached on the necessity of the twin prime condition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential misunderstandings in the phrasing of the proof and its implications, highlighting the need for clarity in mathematical statements. The discussion also touches on the geometric interpretation of the proof, which introduces additional layers of reasoning.

Math100
Messages
823
Reaction score
234
Homework Statement
If ## 1 ## is added to a product of twin primes, prove that a perfect square is always obtained.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
Then we have ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##.
Thus, ## (p+1)^2 ## is a perfect square.
Therefore, if ## 1 ## is added to a product of twin primes,
then a perfect square is always obtained.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and fishturtle1
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. Stylistically, one might write "Thus, ##p(p+2)+1## is a perfect square." instead of "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square.".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
… although the restriction to twin primes is unnecessary. As should be clear from the proof, it holds for any two integers that differ by two.

Edit: There is also a rather intuitive geometric interpretation: Make a square out of (p+1)^2 unit boxes. Take the top row containing p+1 unit boxes and place p of them in a column on the right side of the rectangle, thus leaving you with a rectangle of side lengths p and p+2 with a single leftover unit box.

Edit 2: Illustration
20220418_193630860_iOS.png


Edit 3: Even easier to see with ##q = p+1##, i.e.,
$$
(q-1)(q+1) = q^2 - 1 \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad q^2 = (q-1)(q+1) + 1.
$$

Edit 4: The generalisation being cutting a strip of width b from the top of a square of side length a and placing a portion of length a-b of the strip to the right of the square, leaving a rectangle with sides a-b and a+b and a square of side length b:
$$
a^2 = (a-b)(a+b) + b^2.
$$
Regardless of ##a## and ##b## being integers or not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, SammyS and PeroK
fishturtle1 said:
Stylistically, one might write "Thus, ##p(p+2)+1## is a perfect square." instead of "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square.".
This is more than a stylistic point: if you say "Thus, ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square" then you are saying "because ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ## then ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square" which is not correct (note 1). The words "Then we have" are also not appropriate here because that is saying "because ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes then ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1##" which is not correct (note 2).

The proof simply needs to be:
Math100 said:
Suppose ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##, which is a perfect square.

Note 1: ##(p+1)^2## is a perfect square independent of the fact that ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1=(p+1)^2 ##.
Note 2: ## p(p+2)+1=p^2+2p+1## independent of whether ## p ## and ## p+2 ## are twin primes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fishturtle1 and Mark44

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K