(Proof) Two right triangles are congruent.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the congruence of two right triangles, ΔPQM and ΔP'Q'M', with right angles at Q and Q', respectively, using both the Pythagorean theorem and isometries. The proof establishes that if the corresponding legs of the triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent, as stated in Theorem 10 from Serge Lang's "Basic Mathematics." The second proof employs isometries, demonstrating that a translation and rotation can map points between the triangles while preserving distances, ultimately confirming their congruence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Familiarity with triangle congruence criteria
  • Knowledge of isometries in geometry
  • Basic concepts of distance in Euclidean space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of triangle congruence and the criteria for congruence
  • Learn about isometries, including translations, rotations, and reflections
  • Explore advanced applications of the Pythagorean theorem in various geometric proofs
  • Review exercises related to congruence and isometries in Serge Lang's "Basic Mathematics"
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, educators teaching triangle congruence, and anyone interested in the application of isometries in mathematical proofs.

vantroff
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, the question is from Serge Lang - Basic mathematics, Page 171 exercise 6.
Thing to prove:
Let ΔPQM and ΔP'Q'M' be right triangles whose right angles are at Q and Q', respectively. Assume that the corresponding legs have the same length:
d(P,Q)=d(P',Q')
d(Q,M)=d(Q',M')
Then the right triangles are congruent.

My first attempt by using the just the Pythagorean theorem.

d(Q,M)2 + d(P,Q)2 = d(P,M)2
d(Q,M)2 + d(P,Q)2
= d(Q',M')2 + d(P',Q')2 = d(P',M')2

It follows that:
d(P,M)2 = d(P',M')2
and
d(P,M) = d(P',M')

We conclude that the triangles are congruent by Theorem 10 in the book (page 168) which states the following:

Let ΔP,Q,M and ΔP',Q',M' be triangles whose corresponding sides have the equal length, that is
d(P,M)=d(P',M')
d(P,Q)=d(P',Q')
d(Q,M)=d(Q',M')
These triangles are congruent.

Second attempt by using isometries (not using Theorem 10 from the book).

There exist translation which maps Q on Q'. Hence it suffices to prove our assertion when Q=Q'. We now assume Q=Q'. Since d(Q,M)=d(Q,M') there exist rotation relative to Q which maps M on M'. This rotation leaves Q fixed.
This reduces the case to :
Q=Q'
M=M'

Now either P=P' or P≠P'. We assume P≠P'.
Let LQM be the line passing through point Q and M.
The segments P'Q and PQ are perpendicular to LQM. Also, d(Q,P')=d(Q,P).
⇒ Q lies on the perpendicular bisector of the segment PP'. The only perpendicular line to PP' which passes through Q is LQM. We conclude that LQM is the perpendicular bisector of PP' and that poins P,Q,P' are collinear and P is at the same distance from Q as P' but in the opposite direction.

There exist reflection through LQM which leaves LQM fixed and maps P on P'.

We found that there exist composite isometry F such that,
F(Q)=Q'
F(M)=M'
F(P)=P'


and given that the image of line segment PQ under isometry G is the line segment between G(P) and G(Q), we conclude the assertion proven.​

Can the red part be replaced by this blue part (or omitted)?
Angle ∠MQP=90° and ∠P'QM=90° ⇒ ∠ P'QP is 180° ⇒ P,Q,P' are collinear.

The second proof is more important to me because I'm at the Isometries part of the book. Is there something wrong with these proofs?
Thanks in advance for everyone who will spend time on this.

 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks fine, both with red and blue. With the blue text, I would keep the last part of the red text about the same distance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vantroff
Just using the fact that my post is at the top...
Thanks for the fast answer!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K