Propagator Operator: Clarifying H Acting & Function of (t-t')

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jewbinson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Propagator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
jewbinson
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
So in the attachment, in fact (6), the formula for the propagator rectangled in red...

is the Hamiltonian ACTING on (t-t')?

is the Hamiltonian a function of (t-t')?

or should it be (this is what I think), to be more clear

U(t,t') = exp((-i/h)(t-t')H), so that when acting on a state |psi>, we have

U(t,t')|psi> = exp((-i/h)(t-t')H|psi>)

where H operates on whatever comes next. The last one makes most sense to me because U is overall an operator, so the RHS should also be an operator.

Unless it means like this:

U(t,t')|psi> = exp((-i/h)H[(t-t')|psi>]) ?

I'm really not sure which one...
 

Attachments

  • propagator_1.jpg
    propagator_1.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 571
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just the Hamiltonian multiplied by (t-t'), so it is what you think it is. Here, you don't have to be careful with the ordering of the operator and the time-dependence, because the Hamiltonian never operates on time. Time and the Hamiltonian always commute.

Also keep in mind that this derivation applies only to time-independent Hamiltonians.