Proper Time Interval: A Puzzler

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of proper time intervals in the context of Special Relativity, specifically focusing on how these intervals are measured from different perspectives. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the definition of proper time and its application in scenarios involving moving observers.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the definition of proper time as it relates to the perspective of observers in different frames of reference. Some participants explore the implications of measuring events from the perspective of the moving observer versus a stationary observer.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's concerns, providing insights into the interpretation of proper time and the significance of reference frames. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, with some clarification offered regarding the definition of "point in space" as frame-dependent.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential misunderstandings about the definition of proper time and the nature of reference frames in Special Relativity, indicating that the original poster is navigating complex concepts that may require further exploration.

cdenne
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm having trouble figuring out from which perspective to measure the proper time interval for Special Relativity. In the textbook, the definition says it's "the time interval between two events measured by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space." But in the derivation of the formula for time dilation, the authors use an example with two observers, one on a moving train, one stationary on Earth. The observer on the train measures the proper time interval as being the time it takes for a beam from a flashlight to go up (directly vertical), bounce off a mirror on the ceiling directly above the observer and return to the flashlight. But as I see it, the observer is not viewing the two events (the light leaving the flashlight and the light returning to the flashlight) at the same point in space because they've moved down the track and are in a different position from when the light left the flashlight. If anyone can help me with this, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know much Special Relativity, so sorry if I'm wrong.


cdenne said:
because they've moved down the track and are in a different position from when the light left the flashlight.

They've only "moved down the track" from the perspective of someone outside of the train. Within the train perspective, though, the flashlight's "position" is the same.
 
Thank you for your response. I thought about that as I was typing the post. "The same position in space" probably refers to the reference frame in which the two events take place. From that perspective, the observer on the train is still in the same position on the train when both events occur whereas the observer outside the train has moved by the time the second event occurs.
 
cdenne said:
In the textbook, the definition says it's "the time interval between two events measured by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space." .

Yes, you have figured it out (in post#3). It should say "by an observer who sees the events occur at the same point in space IN HIS FRAME OF REFERENCE".

There is no such thing as a "point in space" except as referenced against some OTHER point. That is "point in space" is frame dependent.
 
Great. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
943
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K