Pros and cons of taking applies mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mdhiggenz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the choice between taking a combined applied mechanics course or separate courses in statics and dynamics. Participants emphasize that combining subjects can complicate learning, suggesting that taking statics and dynamics separately may be more beneficial. One contributor notes that statics is generally easier, while dynamics is more complex, particularly regarding 3D motion of rigid bodies. There is a recommendation to consult with academic advisors and faculty for tailored advice based on individual interests and career goals. Additional details about course content and structure are requested to provide more informed guidance.
Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

My major gives the option of taking either applied mechanics, or two separate courses on statics and dynamics.

I'm thinking of the latter, since mixing two subjects into one class usually is never a good idea.

What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your major?

And could you post course descriptions for all 3?
 
Also - make sure you speak with your advisor and perhaps other faculty about their recommendations. One option may be more preferred than the other based upon your interests and future goals.

Best of luck,

jason
 
I'm assuming you're in engineering (due to the Statics and Dynamics). I would suggest you do the Statics and Dynamics--if there is a single equivalent course (assuming it is done over one semester) it would be much harder IMO.

Statics was literally the easiest thing ever, however, Dynamics was far more involved (only one section actually--3D motion of rigid bodies [velocity and acceleration]). I can't imagine having taken both at the same time (assuming you have a full course load otherwise).

Actually, I think we need more information--details regarding all the assumptions I made would be helpful.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Back
Top