Prove 2ab<= a^2+b^2 using order axioms

  • Thread starter Thread starter whyme1010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality 2ab ≤ a² + b² using order axioms and basic axioms of real numbers. A common approach mentioned is to rearrange the inequality to form (a - b)², which is non-negative. Participants express uncertainty about the rigor of their proofs and the validity of assuming that squares of real numbers are non-negative. The conversation also touches on proving that a² is always greater than or equal to zero for all real numbers a. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of adhering to axioms while exploring the proof.
whyme1010
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove 2ab<= a^2+b^2 using order axioms
Of course use of other basic axioms for real numbers are also okay.

Homework Equations


axioms for set of real numbers.


The Attempt at a Solution


The easy way to do this would be just subtract 2ab from both sides, factor, and see that (a-b)^2 is greater or equal to zero.

But we have to use the basic axioms. So I tried constructing a^2+b^2-2ab by multiplying (a-b)(a-b) using the axioms. I'm not sure I was rigorous enough. Also I'm not sure whether I can just say a square of a real number is greater than zero. Though it is easy to prove.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use only the order axioms and the field axioms. I don't think you can use squared numbers are greater than zero.
 
well then I can just prove that a^2 is always greater or equal to zero.

a>0
Then a(a)>(a)0
a^3>0

a<0
a+(-a)<0+(-a)
0<-a
-a(0)<(-a)(-a)
0<(-1)(-1)(a)(a)
0<a

a=0
a(a)=0(a)
a^2=0

So a^2 >=0
 
whyme1010 said:
well then I can just prove that a^2 is always greater or equal to zero.

a>0
Then a(a)>(a)0
a^3>0

a<0
a+(-a)<0+(-a)
0<-a
-a(0)<(-a)(-a)
0<(-1)(-1)(a)(a)
0<a

a=0
a(a)=0(a)
a^2=0

So a^2 >=0

Hmmm I guess so. did you prove that (-x)(-y)=-(xy)?
 
yeah. I also solved this by using three lemmas. =) Don't know how to close the thread though.
 
happysauce said:
Hmmm I guess so. did you prove that (-x)(-y)=-(xy)?

I sure hope he didn't.
 
Mentallic said:
I sure hope he didn't.

woops I mean (x)(-y) = -(xy)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K