Prove A^B A^C = A^{B+C}: Steps & Tips

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Deadstar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation A^{B+C} = A^B A^C for three cardinals A, B, and C. Participants suggest using a disjoint union approach, where B and C are treated as disjoint sets, allowing for the construction of functions f_1 and f_2 mapping from B and C to A, respectively. A key insight is the definition of the mapping function Φ: A^{B+C} → A^{B} A^{C}, which is proposed to be a bijection. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding cardinality and function mappings in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cardinal numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with function mappings in set theory
  • Knowledge of disjoint unions in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of bijections and their significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cardinal numbers in set theory
  • Learn about disjoint unions and their applications
  • Explore the concept of bijections in mathematical functions
  • Investigate advanced topics in cardinal arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to cardinal numbers and function mappings.

Deadstar
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Let A,B,C be three cardinals. Show that...

[tex]A^{B+C} = A^B A^C[/tex]

I thought about using some some of distinguishing scheme where we denoted [tex]B \cup C[/tex] as [tex]B \times \{0\} \cup C \times \{1\}[/tex] so we could map thing easily but apparently that's not right and you can assume they are disjoint anyway...

EDIT: I just noticed the sticky at the top, this was just something in the notes we had that wasn't proven, not an assignment question or anything and I wanted to know how to do it. Should I repost this in another section?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two hints:

(1) Assuming that B and C are disjoint (which we may always assume by that construction, because it doesn't change the cardinality), any function from B + C (the disjoint union of B and C) may always be thought as the union of two functions:
[tex] f_1:\B \rightarrow A[/tex]

[tex] f_2:\C \rightarrow A[/tex]

[tex] f=f_1\cup f_2[/tex]

(2) Consider the application:

[tex] \Phi:A^{B+C}\rightarrow A^{B} A^{C}[/tex]

Defined by:

[tex] \Phi\left(f\right)\left(a\right) = \left(f_1\left(a\right),f_2\left(a\right)\right)[/tex]

For [itex]a \in A[/itex]. Is it a bijection?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K