MHB Prove a given number is an odd integer

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that the product of 5 positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ satisfying the equation $pqrst=5(qrst+prst+pqst+pqrt+pqrs)$ is an odd integer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that the product of 5 positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ satisfying the equation $pqrst=5(qrst+prst+pqst+pqrt+pqrs)$ is an odd integer.
Should there be some extra condition here? If not, I think that the result is false.

Suppose that $p=q=r=20$ and $s=t=40$. Then $$\frac1p + \frac1q + \frac1r + \frac1s + \frac1t = \frac1{20} + \frac1{20} + \frac1{20} + \frac1{40} + \frac1{40} = \frac4{20} = \frac15.$$ Multiply out the fractions to see that $pqrst=5(qrst+prst+pqst+pqrt+pqrs)$. But each of the integers $p,q,r,s,t$ is even, and so is their product.
 
I am so so sorry for the late response, Opalg! I can explain:o...I was very busy celebrating Chinese New Year with my family and relatives in the past few days. Sorry...

I checked and argh! I typed the problem wrongly:mad:, I am deeply sorry about that...the problem should read as follow:

Prove that the number of 5 positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ satisfying the equation $pqrst=5(qrst+prst+pqst+pqrt+pqrs)$ is an odd integer.
 
Solution of other:

We rewrite the given equation as

$\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}+\dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{1}{5}$

The number of five positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ which satisfy the given relation and for which $p\ne q$ is even, because for if $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ is a solution, then so is $(q,\,p,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ which is distinct from $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$.

Similarly the number of five positive integers which satisfy the equation and for which $r\ne s$ is also even.

Hence, it sufices to count only those five positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ for which $p=q$ and $r=s$. Thus the equation reduces to

$\dfrac{2}{p}+\dfrac{2}{r}+\dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{1}{5}$

Here again $(p,\,p,\,r,\,r,\,t)$ for which $p\ne r$ is even.

Thus, it suffices to consider the equation

$\dfrac{4}{p}+\dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{1}{5}$

and show that the number of pairs $(p,\,t)$ satisfying this equation is odd.

This reduces to

$pt=20t+5p$

$(p-20)(t-5)=100$

Observe that

$100=1\times 100=2\times 50=4\times 25=5\times 20=10\times 10=20\times 5=25\times 4=50\times 2=100\times 1$

Note that no factorization of 100 as product of two negative numbers yield a positive pairs $(p,\,t)$.

Hence we get these 9 solutions. This proves that the total number of five positive integers $(p,\,q,\,r,\,s,\,t)$ satifying the given equation is odd.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top