Prove Compact Metric Space is Locally Path Connected

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hedipaldi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that any compact metric space that is locally connected must also be locally path connected. Participants seek assistance in understanding the proof and the necessary conditions for this statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help to prove that a compact metric space that is locally connected is also locally path connected.
  • Another participant suggests that a locally connected and connected metric space is locally path connected and proposes considering the set of points reachable by paths from a given point.
  • A different participant expresses difficulty in showing that this set is clopen, indicating that compactness may be a necessary condition.
  • Reference is made to Willard's theorem 31.2 as a potential resource for the proof.
  • Another participant mentions the Hahn-Mazurkiewicz theorem as providing an answer to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are multiple references to different theorems and approaches, indicating competing views on how to tackle the proof.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of compactness and the nature of the sets involved, but specific assumptions and definitions remain unresolved.

hedipaldi
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am trying to prove that any compact metric space that is also locally connected,must be locally path connected.
can someone help?
thank's in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know that a locally connected and connected metric space is locally path connected?

To prove that, consider an element x the set of all y such that there is a path from x to y.
 
You mean to show that this is clopen?This is my difficulty.I suppose the compacity is needed
 
Last edited:
Check Willard theorem 31.2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
hahn mazurkiewicz theorem gives the answer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
633
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K