Prove Constant: Entire Function f(z)=f(1/z)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that an entire function \( f(z) \) satisfying the condition \( f(z) = f(1/z) \) for all \( z \) is constant. Participants utilized Liouville's theorem to demonstrate that \( f \) is bounded both inside and outside the unit ball, leading to the conclusion that \( f \) must be constant. The proof involved expressing \( f(z) \) as a Laurent series and applying the uniqueness property of these series to show that all coefficients except for the constant term are zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of entire functions
  • Familiarity with Liouville's theorem
  • Knowledge of Laurent series
  • Concept of bounded functions in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Liouville's theorem in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties and applications of Laurent series
  • Learn about the uniqueness property of power series
  • Investigate other conditions under which entire functions are constant
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, students studying entire functions, and anyone interested in the properties of analytic functions.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
if f is entire and f(z) = f(1/z) for all z, Prove f is constant
any hint ?

I was thinking about if I can prove that f' = 0 then we are done so
$f(z) = f\left(\dfrac{1}{z}\right)$
$f(x,y) = f\left(\dfrac{x}{x^2+y^2} , \dfrac{-y}{x^2+y^2} \right) $

I thought about Cauchy remain Equations.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have a solution that uses Taylor and Laurent series. If you know about those series, that's a hint. Otherwise, it might be helpful for you to state in which section of text this problem occurs.
 
Amer said:
if f is entire and f(z) = f(1/z) for all z, Prove f is constant
any hint ?
Use Liouville's theorem – show that $f$ is bounded in the unit ball. Then the condition $ f(z) = f(1/z)$ shows that it is also bounded outside the unit ball, hence everywhere.
 
Here's my solution, which is quite different from Opalg's elegant argument:

Since $f$ is entire, we can write

$f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

which converges for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$. Rewrite this as a Laurent series:

$f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

where $a_n = 0$ for $n<0$. Then

$f(1/z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

Since $f(z)=f(1/z)$, we have

$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

By the uniqueness property of Laurent series, we see that $a_n=a_{-n}$ for all $n$. Therefore, $a_n=0$ for all $n \neq 0$. We conclude that $f(z)=a_0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$, so $f$ is constant.
 
Petek said:
Here's my solution, which is quite different from Opalg's elegant argument:

Since $f$ is entire, we can write

$f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

which converges for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$. Rewrite this as a Laurent series:

$f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

where $a_n = 0$ for $n<0$. Then

$f(1/z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

Since $f(z)=f(1/z)$, we have

$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

By the uniqueness property of Laurent series, we see that $a_n=a_{-n}$ for all $n$. Therefore, $a_n=0$ for all $n \neq 0$. We conclude that $f(z)=a_0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$, so $f$ is constant.

$\displaystyle f \left( \frac{1}{z} \right) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_{-n} z^n $

Why if $a_n = a_{-n} $ we conclude $a_n = 0 $ for all $n$ non zero ?
Thanks
 
Amer said:
$\displaystyle f \left( \frac{1}{z} \right) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_{-n} z^n $

Why if $a_n = a_{-n} $ we conclude $a_n = 0 $ for all $n$ non zero ?
Thanks

Sorry, I should have explained that better. In the expression $f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_nz^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n<0$ are zero. On the other hand, in the expression $f(1/z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_{-n}z^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n>0$ are zero. The equation $a_n=a_{-n}$, simply says that the coefficients of each power of $z$ in the two series are equal. Since, for nonzero $n$, the coefficient of $z^n$ is $0$ in at least one of the series, we conclude that all the coefficients of such powers of $z$ are $0$.

Hope that makes my argument more clear.
 
Petek said:
Sorry, I should have explained that better. In the expression $f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_nz^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n<0$ are zero. On the other hand, in the expression $f(1/z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_{-n}z^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n>0$ are zero. The equation $a_n=a_{-n}$, simply says that the coefficients of each power of $z$ in the two series are equal. Since, for nonzero $n$, the coefficient of $z^n$ is $0$ in at least one of the series, we conclude that all the coefficients of such powers of $z$ are $0$.

Hope that makes my argument more clear.

Very clear thanks for your effort.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K