Prove Constant: Entire Function f(z)=f(1/z)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that an entire function \( f(z) \) satisfying the condition \( f(z) = f(1/z) \) for all \( z \) must be constant. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of series expansions and theorems from complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests proving that \( f' = 0 \) to conclude that \( f \) is constant, indicating a potential approach using Cauchy’s equations.
  • Another participant proposes using Taylor and Laurent series as a method to tackle the problem, hinting at the importance of these series in the solution.
  • A different approach involves applying Liouville's theorem to show that \( f \) is bounded in the unit ball and consequently everywhere, leading to the conclusion that \( f \) is constant.
  • One participant provides a detailed argument using Laurent series, showing that the coefficients \( a_n \) must equal \( a_{-n} \) and concludes that all coefficients for non-zero \( n \) must be zero, thus \( f(z) = a_0 \).
  • Another participant seeks clarification on why the equality \( a_n = a_{-n} \) implies that all non-zero coefficients must be zero, leading to a discussion about the implications of the series representations.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the nature of the coefficients in the series, emphasizing that coefficients for negative powers are zero in one series and positive in the other, reinforcing the conclusion about the coefficients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches and reasoning, but there is no consensus on a single method or resolution of the problem. Various models and arguments are explored without agreement on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on properties of entire functions and series expansions, but the discussion does not resolve the dependencies on specific assumptions or theorems, leaving some mathematical steps and implications open for further exploration.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
if f is entire and f(z) = f(1/z) for all z, Prove f is constant
any hint ?

I was thinking about if I can prove that f' = 0 then we are done so
$f(z) = f\left(\dfrac{1}{z}\right)$
$f(x,y) = f\left(\dfrac{x}{x^2+y^2} , \dfrac{-y}{x^2+y^2} \right) $

I thought about Cauchy remain Equations.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have a solution that uses Taylor and Laurent series. If you know about those series, that's a hint. Otherwise, it might be helpful for you to state in which section of text this problem occurs.
 
Amer said:
if f is entire and f(z) = f(1/z) for all z, Prove f is constant
any hint ?
Use Liouville's theorem – show that $f$ is bounded in the unit ball. Then the condition $ f(z) = f(1/z)$ shows that it is also bounded outside the unit ball, hence everywhere.
 
Here's my solution, which is quite different from Opalg's elegant argument:

Since $f$ is entire, we can write

$f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

which converges for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$. Rewrite this as a Laurent series:

$f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

where $a_n = 0$ for $n<0$. Then

$f(1/z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

Since $f(z)=f(1/z)$, we have

$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

By the uniqueness property of Laurent series, we see that $a_n=a_{-n}$ for all $n$. Therefore, $a_n=0$ for all $n \neq 0$. We conclude that $f(z)=a_0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$, so $f$ is constant.
 
Petek said:
Here's my solution, which is quite different from Opalg's elegant argument:

Since $f$ is entire, we can write

$f(z) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

which converges for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$. Rewrite this as a Laurent series:

$f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n$

where $a_n = 0$ for $n<0$. Then

$f(1/z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

Since $f(z)=f(1/z)$, we have

$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_nz^n=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_{-n}z^n$

By the uniqueness property of Laurent series, we see that $a_n=a_{-n}$ for all $n$. Therefore, $a_n=0$ for all $n \neq 0$. We conclude that $f(z)=a_0$ for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$, so $f$ is constant.

$\displaystyle f \left( \frac{1}{z} \right) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_{-n} z^n $

Why if $a_n = a_{-n} $ we conclude $a_n = 0 $ for all $n$ non zero ?
Thanks
 
Amer said:
$\displaystyle f \left( \frac{1}{z} \right) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_{-n} z^n $

Why if $a_n = a_{-n} $ we conclude $a_n = 0 $ for all $n$ non zero ?
Thanks

Sorry, I should have explained that better. In the expression $f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_nz^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n<0$ are zero. On the other hand, in the expression $f(1/z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_{-n}z^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n>0$ are zero. The equation $a_n=a_{-n}$, simply says that the coefficients of each power of $z$ in the two series are equal. Since, for nonzero $n$, the coefficient of $z^n$ is $0$ in at least one of the series, we conclude that all the coefficients of such powers of $z$ are $0$.

Hope that makes my argument more clear.
 
Petek said:
Sorry, I should have explained that better. In the expression $f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_nz^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n<0$ are zero. On the other hand, in the expression $f(1/z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_{-n}z^n$ all of the $a_n$ with $n>0$ are zero. The equation $a_n=a_{-n}$, simply says that the coefficients of each power of $z$ in the two series are equal. Since, for nonzero $n$, the coefficient of $z^n$ is $0$ in at least one of the series, we conclude that all the coefficients of such powers of $z$ are $0$.

Hope that makes my argument more clear.

Very clear thanks for your effort.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K