MHB Prove: f(x) = 0 has infinitely many solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The function f defined on the interval [0,1] satisfies f(0) = f(1) = 0 and the condition f((a+b)/2) ≤ f(a) + f(b) for any a, b in [0,1]. By analyzing the function at specific points, it is shown that f must equal 0 at dyadic rationals, leading to the conclusion that f(x) = 0 has infinitely many solutions. An example of such a function is f(x) = 0 if x is rational and f(x) = 1 if x is irrational, which meets the conditions outlined. This demonstrates the existence of nontrivial functions that satisfy the given properties.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
The function, $f$, is defined on the interval $[0;1]$, and satisfies the following conditions:

(a). $f(0) = f(1) = 0$.

(b). For any $a,b \in [0;1]$: $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leq f(a)+f(b)$.

Prove, that the equation: $f(x)=0$ has infinitely many solutions.

Give an example of such a function, that is not identically zero on any subinterval of $[0;1]$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
The function, $f$, is defined on the interval $[0;1]$, and satisfies the following conditions:

(a). $f(0) = f(1) = 0$.

(b). For any $a,b \in [0;1]$: $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leq f(a)+f(b)$.

Prove, that the equation: $f(x)=0$ has infinitely many solutions.

Give an example of such a function, that is not identically zero on any subinterval of $[0;1]$.
[sp]Putting $a=0$ and $b=1$, you see that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \leqslant 0+0 = 0$.

Now suppose that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = k < 0$. Then (putting $a=0$ and $b= \frac12$), $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) \leqslant 0+k = k$. Also ((putting $a=1$ and $b= \frac12$), $f\bigl(\frac34\bigr) \leqslant 0+k = k$. Then putting $a=\frac14$ and $b = \frac34$, you see that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \leqslant k+k = 2k$. But $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = k$, so that $k\leqslant 2k$. That implies that $k\geqslant0$, contradicting the assumption that $k<0$. It follows that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr)$ must be $0$.

Next, put $a=0$ and $b=\frac12$ to see that $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) \leqslant 0+0 = 0$. Also, exactly as in the previous paragraph, if $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) < 0$ then we get a contradiction. So $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) = 0$, and similarly $f\bigl(\frac34\bigr) = 0$.

Continuing to bisect the interval in this way, you see that $f(x) = 0$ for every dyadic rational $x$. Thus $f(x) = 0$ has infinitely many solutions.

A nontrivial example of such a function is $f(x) = \begin{cases}0&\text{if }x\text{ is rational,}\\1&\text{if }x\text{ is irrational.}\end{cases}$ For that function, if $a$ and $b$ are both rational then so is $\frac{a+b}2$, and so the inequality $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leqslant f(a)+f(b)$ becomes $0\leqslant 0+0$, which is certainly true. Otherwise, if at least one of $a$, $b$ is irrational then the right side of the inequality will be at least $1$, and the left side will be at most $1$. So again the inequality is satisfied.

[/sp]
 
Thankyou for your participation and stringent, elegant answer, Opalg!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top