MHB Prove: f(x) = 0 has infinitely many solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The function f defined on the interval [0,1] satisfies f(0) = f(1) = 0 and the condition f((a+b)/2) ≤ f(a) + f(b) for any a, b in [0,1]. By analyzing the function at specific points, it is shown that f must equal 0 at dyadic rationals, leading to the conclusion that f(x) = 0 has infinitely many solutions. An example of such a function is f(x) = 0 if x is rational and f(x) = 1 if x is irrational, which meets the conditions outlined. This demonstrates the existence of nontrivial functions that satisfy the given properties.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
The function, $f$, is defined on the interval $[0;1]$, and satisfies the following conditions:

(a). $f(0) = f(1) = 0$.

(b). For any $a,b \in [0;1]$: $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leq f(a)+f(b)$.

Prove, that the equation: $f(x)=0$ has infinitely many solutions.

Give an example of such a function, that is not identically zero on any subinterval of $[0;1]$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
The function, $f$, is defined on the interval $[0;1]$, and satisfies the following conditions:

(a). $f(0) = f(1) = 0$.

(b). For any $a,b \in [0;1]$: $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leq f(a)+f(b)$.

Prove, that the equation: $f(x)=0$ has infinitely many solutions.

Give an example of such a function, that is not identically zero on any subinterval of $[0;1]$.
[sp]Putting $a=0$ and $b=1$, you see that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \leqslant 0+0 = 0$.

Now suppose that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = k < 0$. Then (putting $a=0$ and $b= \frac12$), $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) \leqslant 0+k = k$. Also ((putting $a=1$ and $b= \frac12$), $f\bigl(\frac34\bigr) \leqslant 0+k = k$. Then putting $a=\frac14$ and $b = \frac34$, you see that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \leqslant k+k = 2k$. But $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = k$, so that $k\leqslant 2k$. That implies that $k\geqslant0$, contradicting the assumption that $k<0$. It follows that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr)$ must be $0$.

Next, put $a=0$ and $b=\frac12$ to see that $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) \leqslant 0+0 = 0$. Also, exactly as in the previous paragraph, if $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) < 0$ then we get a contradiction. So $f\bigl(\frac14\bigr) = 0$, and similarly $f\bigl(\frac34\bigr) = 0$.

Continuing to bisect the interval in this way, you see that $f(x) = 0$ for every dyadic rational $x$. Thus $f(x) = 0$ has infinitely many solutions.

A nontrivial example of such a function is $f(x) = \begin{cases}0&\text{if }x\text{ is rational,}\\1&\text{if }x\text{ is irrational.}\end{cases}$ For that function, if $a$ and $b$ are both rational then so is $\frac{a+b}2$, and so the inequality $f\left ( \frac{a+b}{2} \right ) \leqslant f(a)+f(b)$ becomes $0\leqslant 0+0$, which is certainly true. Otherwise, if at least one of $a$, $b$ is irrational then the right side of the inequality will be at least $1$, and the left side will be at most $1$. So again the inequality is satisfied.

[/sp]
 
Thankyou for your participation and stringent, elegant answer, Opalg!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top