Prove Graph is Function: Logic & Alternatives

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for proving that a graph represents a function, particularly focusing on alternatives to the horizontal line test. Participants explore the use of logic and the implications of different mathematical forms, including equations of the type f(x,y) = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the adequacy of the horizontal line test and suggests that logic may be a better tool for proving a graph is a function.
  • Another participant distinguishes between showing a graph is representative of a function versus demonstrating that an equation can express y as a function of x.
  • A participant provides examples illustrating the necessity of having a unique y value for each x to establish a function, using the equations of a circle and a linear equation as examples.
  • Concerns are raised about the domain of functions, noting that certain equations may not define y for all real numbers, thus affecting their status as functions.
  • There is a discussion about whether it is necessary to rearrange equations to determine if they represent a function, with some suggesting that rearrangement may be complex or unfeasible for certain functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of rearranging equations and the implications of domain restrictions, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential complexity of rearranging certain equations and the dependence on definitions of functions, particularly regarding their domains.

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I'm interested in getting a better answer to showing/proving a graph is a function than the usual "horizontal line test" response. Is the use of logic the best tool for proving a function? Because that line test method is basically that.
Also, translating the function by illustrating it on the x-y plane isn't always so simple without a calculator, so other methods may be necessary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you want to do. Are you trying to show a graph is representative of a function (in which case you don't need to worry about trying to draw it) or are you trying to show that an equation of the form f(x,y) = 0 i.e. an equation with x's and y's can be written so that y is a function of x?
 
I'm trying to show the second that you mentioned :smile:

Office_Shredder said:
or are you trying to show that an equation of the form f(x,y) = 0 i.e. an equation with x's and y's can be written so that y is a function of x?
 
What you really need to show is:

Given a value of x, there is only one possible value of y(x). Example for each:

x2 + y2 = 1

If x = [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex] then y can be plus or minus [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex] so this does not give a function (and drawing the circle we see this is obvious). More generally, if y2 = 1-x2 and w2 = 1-x2 for the same value of x, then y2 = w2 so y= +/- w and in general y and w do not have to be equal

If on the other hand we have 2y-x-1 = 0 Then if 2y-x-1 = 0 and 2w-x-1 = 0 for a set value of x, then 2y=x+1=2w and we can see y=w is necessary. Hence for each value of x there is only a single value of y that satisfies this, and y can be defined as a function of x.

There's also another possible concern about the domain. y is a function of x over the real numbers by definition also means for each x, there exists a possible value of y. If your possible function was [itex]y = \sqrt{1-x^2}[/itex] (taking only positive values of square root) unlike in the circle case this satisfies the condition for each x there is at most one value of y. But by definition, this is not a function over the real numbers because outside of the interval [-1,1] y is not defined. Instead it's only a function over that interval. Generally this isn't the condition you're worried about though (since what the domain of the function is probably isn't the question at hand)
 
So it is necessary to make the y variable of an equation f(x,y) the subject so as to know if it is the form [tex]y^2=y(x)[/tex] or maybe other operative functions that result in more than one value such as [tex]sin(y)=y(x)[/tex] or others that exist (which I wouldn't know about).
Is it possible to show the equation is a function or not without re-arranging the equation? Possibly because re-arrangement would be too difficult or impossible with elementary functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K