Prove Induction: (1+2+4+...+2^n)+1=2^(n+1)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter John112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the formula (1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^n) + 1 = 2^(n+1) for all n ≥ 0 using mathematical induction. The basis step confirms that for n = 0, both sides equal 2. The inductive step assumes the formula holds for n = k, leading to the conclusion that (1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^k + 2^(k+1)) + 1 simplifies correctly to 2^(k+2) + 1, thus validating the proof. Participants agree that the initial proof presented contained an error regarding the "+1" term.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
  • Knowledge of summation notation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in detail
  • Explore properties of geometric series and their sums
  • Learn about the commutative property of addition
  • Investigate common pitfalls in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching proof techniques, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of mathematical induction and series summation.

John112
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
To prove: (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{n}) + 1 = 2^{n+1} , ∀n ≥ 0 .
Basis Step n = 0: LEFT HAND SIDE: (2^{0})+ 1 = 1 + 1 = 2 RIGHT HAND SIDE 2^{0} + 1 = 2
Inductive Step: Assume (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k}) + 1 = 2^{k+1}
Then (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k} + 2^{k+1}) + 1 = 2^{k+1} + 2^{k+1} + 1 = 2^{k+2} + 1.

Is this proof right? This is a proof given to one of the example problems in the book. To me it seems wrong. If it is right then can someone explain how the +1 came to be at the end ( 2^{k+2} + 1).

Isn't the above proof should be like this?

so (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k} + 2^{k+1}) + 1 = 2^{k+1} + 2^{k+1} = 2^{k+2}

Because (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k} + 2^{k+1}) + 1 can be rewritten as

[(1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k}) + 1] + 2^{k+1} by commutative property of addition. From the inductive step we assumed that (1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k}) + 1 = 2^{k+1}

[(1 + 2 + 4 + . . . + 2^{k}) + 1] + 2^{k+1} = 2^{k+1} + 2^{k+1} = 2^{k+2}
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
John112 said:
Isn't the above proof should be like this?
Indeed. The second version is good, the first has some wrong "+1".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K